Jump to content

Talk:Famicom Detective Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Linkdude20002001 (talk | contribs) at 22:57, 13 June 2021 (→‎Image). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Tose

DrSanic Regarding Tose, they are a well known shadow developer, meaning they do work on contract and don't carry much in creative direction of the projects they work on. They might get mentioned in the credits, but are not normally considered "co-developers" and should be omitted from the infobox. If you can find a source stating that they worked on one or both of the original games, it could be mentioned in prose, but not the infobox. According to the Virtual Console page, they share copyright with Nintendo over the Wii Virtual Console release of the first game [1], but not the second game [2] or its remake [3]. I don't know if that means they worked on the original or only the VC version. We need better sources. TarkusABtalk/contrib 15:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Do we really want to use the remake artwork for the infobox? I know that normally VG articles tend to use English cover art, but this is a classic from 33 years ago - it feels odd to then be using 2021 art, especially as the infobox artwork is meant to serve as visual recognition of the article subject. We can still "represent" the remake visually by adding its logo, as it "consists only of simple geometric shapes or text".--AlexandraIDV 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I understand what you are saying. I picked that artwork because I felt it was the best compromise, but I agree with your thoughts and I'm not totally convinced it's the best choice. My reasoning with picking that artwork was:
  • The original artwork is virtually unknown and unrecognized outside Japan.
  • The original games actually have four covers. Two games, released on two discs each, so four total separate cover arts.
  • MOS:LEADIMAGE suggests that while image should be "representative", they should also "give readers visual confirmation that they've arrived at the right page" and "what our readers will expect to see".
  • Once the games are released on the Switch, those versions will be primarily what is known among our readers, not the FDS logo/art.
  • The logo actually differs between the Switch games, and this was the only official combined logo I could find.
  • Finding a PD version of the Switch logo (without the design) may be difficult. A PD version of the FDS logo (all japanese text) isn't really helpful to our readers.
Maybe putting both Switch logos (as seen here), the second below the other, instead of trying to find a combined version would be better. Open to suggestions. TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the main problem is that the two games are on a single page. This isn't like The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Season and The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages which were made at the same time, and must both be played to reach the ending. Or Pokemon Red Version and Pokemon Blue Version which are the same game with slight alterations to make them different enough to require trading with a friend. This is one game that was made and sold in 1988, and another that was made and sold in 1989. But that aside, I think the combined English logo is prefered. That's what would be on the cover art of the box...if the physical release wasn't Japan-only. Maybe it would be better to zoom in on the logo so the conflicting artwork won't be seen. Then you're left with only a logo (and some moon, buildings, and sky). I made one (counted the pixles to make sure it was perfectly centered), and it looks alright. It would do till Nintendo or America or Europe puts out the clean logo somewhere. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 04:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We can't use custom crops like that unfortunately, but hopefully we can get an official crop like that soon. That or we show both covers or logos like Link: The Faces of Evil and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon. TarkusABtalk/contrib 13:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If we can show multiple covers, I'd suggest showing all four of the original FCD covers then. Tho, I suppose it would make the most sense for it to be a logo, like all the other main Nintendo pages. I guess I vote to leave it as is...for now. There will be a clean version of the logo eventually. I'll even ask NoA and NoE for it. Maybe they'll post it. Advertizing these games is cruicial to their success. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, for the mean time, maybe this (https://cdn02.nintendo-europe.com/media/images/11_square_images/games_18/nintendo_switch_download_software/SQ_NSwitchDS_FamicomDetectiveClub_Combo.jpg) would be a better depiction of the logo. I think it the logo would be slightly larger for the reader to see. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 19:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandra IDV: @Linkdude20002001: I have changed out the image to show all four FCD covers. Curious what your thoughts are. Linkdude, sorry I changed out the image before seeing your suggestion, but I think yours is better than the first one, at least. TarkusABtalk/contrib 19:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy with the image, although it would be good if you could fill in the sites you got them from in the file's Source parameter instead of vaguely referring to "various internet sources".--AlexandraIDV 22:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Random Japanese blogs. TarkusABtalk/contrib 22:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that looks nice. Good work! It really shows what the page is about. It's a shame that one day it'll be replaced with just the series logo, but it's like that for all the other Nintendo franchises, so I guess it's only fair. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oof, I don't like the montage of the four covers. Too busy, too shrunk down. I would just use the first of the historical covers. (Or the modern image. I liked how the modern one was in English and how it elegantly covered both games. But I understand Wikipedia has a general preference for using the original artwork for media.) WanderingWanda (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
IDK, I've come around to feeling that the current four cover montage is the best we can do at this time. I understand it's busy, but no Disk System cover is more iconic or recognizable than the other, and Part II is arguably the more well known entry. The Switch cover, while nice for a number of reasons, is inferior to the Disk System art collage in that the latter reflects the art design of the original, its episodic nature, and their age. The look of the remake is quite different. Since most of the article is talking about the originals, it is not representative of the topic to use the remake artwork. TarkusABtalk/contrib 03:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
TarkusAB, Alexandra IDV, Linkdude20002001: Well, let me point to precedent: I can't think of any other series article that uses a montage in this way, including articles about other episodic videogames. The Walking Dead (video game series), Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People, Half-Life (series), Star Fox, Cooking Mama, Naruto, The Boxcar Children, The Chronicles of Narnia, Canon of Sherlock Holmes, etc, etc. I think it's a poor choice for the same reason that, say, using a 5pt font in an article would be: the images are shrunk down to the point of almost uselessness. WanderingWanda (talk) 19:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WanderingWanda, all the video game series examples you gave use the logo, which is, last I checked, not possible for this one due to some stupid "no cropping" rule. And I don't know what you mean by "episodic", since none of the examples you gave are like this situation with a Volume 1 and Volume 2 of the same game. I could see how maybe ommiting the second game would make sense, but you'd still have two cover arts... Really we just need to try to get the logo from NoA or NoE, like we have for all the other serieses.Linkdude20002001 (talk) 22:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composer of Vol. 1

The composer is given as either a pseudonym or a mononym, and the actual, full name is not known. I asked on Manual of Style/Film for what to do in such a situation, and was told that the name, pseudonym/mononym or not, should be credited. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you ask MOS/Film and not MOS/VG? Lots of early Japanese games used pseudonyms and I've never seen them in infoboxes. It's not helpful to the reader to list a pseudonym, and could mislead the reader that it is their actual name. The composer is not known. TarkusABtalk/contrib 12:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But just listing Kenji Yamamoto will mislead the reader...into thinking that he composesd for both games; they aren't going to click on the little "b". And I asked on the one for films, since it's "more important", being that far more people watch movies than play video games (ie. more mainstream). So if that's what the bigger, more mainstream media does, it makes sense to do that for the smaller media categories.Linkdude20002001 (talk) 22:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Famicom_Detective_Club&oldid=1028428719"