Talk:List of fellows of the Royal Society of Arts
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Expanding the list
I do not know whether the RSA publishes a list of Fellows, but the contents of the now-deleted Category:Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts can serve as a starting-point for expanding this list. -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- The RSA says there are 27,000 Fellows. The list is therefore "Some Fellows of the RSA". Marshall46 (talk) 12:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Userbox
Is there a Wikipedia userbox for Fellows of the RSA? If not, would it be a Good Thing to knock one up? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 23:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete this list?
I am concerned that this list is not suited to Wikipedia:
- Wikipedia is not about detailed lists of people or services - see WP:NOTDIRECTORY
- Either the list is already in the public domain, in which case a simple link to it will suffice, or it is not, in which case posting it here is Original Research and not allowed - see WP:NOR
- Many FRSAs' might not appreciate being listed here - and what possible benefit would a list of 27,000 individuals bring to Wikipedia? - see WP:BADIDEA
There is not even a case for a list of Fellows who have bios on Wikipedia - the previous Category set up for this purpose has been deleted - see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_February_3#Category:Fellows_of_the_Royal_Society_of_Arts
Does anybody have anything to say in its defence before I propose this article's deletion? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC) Updated: link to Category discussion — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete! 78.149.169.182 (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Addition to the list
Hi, Stephen Hawking's page describes him being a fellow, so he could be added to the list. If the previous article for deleting this page is not applied ofcourse. 94.227.103.155 (talk)< —Preceding undated comment added 09:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC).
I'm adding Steve Baker to the list of fellows.Storris - Storris (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedian FRSA
Wikipedians who are FRSA may wish to use {{User:UBX/FRSA}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 01:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Members without Wikipedia entry but still relevant
Hi, I have added Marco Henry V. Neumüller Lord of Pishobury MBE because he is one of the very few members who is German. Hope that is ok. His bio is publicly available on the internet.--194.146.213.16 (talk) 14:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2015
![]() | This edit request to List of Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
John Gamblin Gambo2014 (talk) 11:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Please include in list of Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts under 'G' as John Gamblin was elected in 2013 [1]11:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Gambo2014 (talk)John Gamblin FRSA
- Do you have a reference for that please? Just providing "Royal Society of Arts" in ref tags, as you have done above, does not count. Thank you. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ Royal Society of Arts
Red Links
I thought that we had decided that we would not add red links to the list. If we have not decided that, can we please do so? Kiltpin (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Was anything finalised on this? My own suggestion would be to adhere strictly to 'no article = no listing' and removal of the red entries especially if only supported by a link to the very basic RSA profile. Thoughts? SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- As there has been no response or specific objections, I will remove all red link entries. Perhaps it might also be worthwhile including a short HTML comment to advise editors not to add entries unless an article already exists but I'll hold off on that meantime. SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812183230/http://bobelle.co.uk/dev/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=100&Itemid=100010 to http://bobelle.co.uk/dev/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=100&Itemid=100010
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130530155058/http://www.thersa.org/venue-hire/the-house to http://www.thersa.org/venue-hire/the-house
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110324021927/http://www.edinaronay.com/heritage to http://www.edinaronay.com/heritage
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Carl Edwin Lindgren ?
Why is Carl Edwin Lindgren in this list? He is not particularly notable, has no article, not even a red link. Kiltpin (talk) 11:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Kiltpin;
Done!
- With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 16:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)