Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mchilds72 (talk | contribs) at 13:46, 14 July 2021 (→‎Lexipol Article Updates: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconCompanies Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

CarZing: Article Review

Hello - I'm writing on behalf of my client, CarZing. CarZing’s mission is to make auto financing quick and easy while providing a modern, hassle free way of shopping for cars. The article (see draft here) was submitted back in December 2020, and is still waiting to be reviewed. Google Search is currently showing outdated company info until this article can help update SEO, which is causing some customers to get confused. My client and I would greatly appreciate if someone could assist in reviewing the article draft. Thank you so much for your help! - Chase

Hi all. About a month ago I proposed making layout changes to the ByteDance article to comply with MOS:LAYOUT and WP:CSECTION, among other things. Specifically, I suggested using a chronologically organized "History" section (similar to Twitter#History) as well as integrating the contents of the Controversy section into other appropriate parts of the article. But I've struggled to generate a constructive discussion on the Talk page (Talk:ByteDance#Fixing MOS:LAYOUT and MOS:LEAD issues) and I will not make the edits myself due to my COI as a ByteDance employee.

I would greatly appreciate if editors reading this could take a few minutes to look at the discussion and consider implementing my proposal, either in part or in full. Thanks, JatBD (talk) 13:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with publishing an update to ATS Automation Tooling Systems

Hello, I have put in changes to the ATS Automation Tooling Systems talk page and am looking for support in getting them published. I am a paid employee of the company.

Merobinson ats (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change name of Wikipedia page from Big Six (law firms) to Top Tier (law firms)

I propose the former name should be updated to the newly suggested name in respect of the article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Six_(law_firms)

I think this is an appropriate suggestion due to the outdated nature of the former term and the widespread usage in industry and media of the new term.

Any thoughts?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AustralianLawMan (talkcontribs) 04:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SBA Communications - Requested Edits

Hello Editors

I work for SBA Communications and we would like to request edits to our page, as we understand that we are not able to make these edits ourselves. I will also post this request on the talk page of the SBA Communications Wikipedia page.

The logo featured on the page is the incorrect logo as it does not feature our registered trademark. The correct logo is available on our SBA Communications.

Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBACB (talkcontribs) 14:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested edits to Draft:Cremades&Calvo-Sotelo

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have the same problem as in the previous post....

I work in communication for this law firm, Cremades & Calvo-Sotelo, and I need editors from outside the company to review the Draft:Cremades&Calvo-Sotelo, so that it can be published. I appreciate all the collaborations and I will also try to help in other articles.
--Ursulabela (talk) 10:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help in improving Vella Group draft

Hello, I would like help regarding Vella Group. It is a real estate company founded by Zach Vella who has appeared on Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles. Please edit the page in such a manner that it does not give the feel of an advertisement and add some reliable, secondary sources to the article. Precariousman123 (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sherwin-Williams controversies section update

Hello editors, I'm dropping in with another quick update in case volunteers here might be interested to help at Talk:Sherwin-Williams. I won't list my full request here, but you may review it on the Sherwin-Williams talk page. I have included the Request Edit template on the S-W talk page, but I wanted to let editors here know about the request in case it is of interest.

As a reminder, I ask for the community's feedback and assistance with edits on my behalf and will not edit the article myself due to my conflict of interest as an employee of Sherwin-Williams. Thanks, as always! MiraSherwin-Williams (talk) 14:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Partners

Hello, WikiProject Companies. I have an outstanding update I requested on the Francisco Partners Talk page. At the bottom of the ongoing discussion, you will see I am hoping editors can update the amount of committed capital Francisco Partners has raised, as well as its offices. Is there a volunteer who is willing to incorporate these changes into the live article for me? I will not make my own updates to the page as I respect the rules in place for my conflict of interest as an employee of Francisco Partners. Thanks for any consideration. Janice at FP (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most viewed stub in this Wikiproject

WordReference.com 70,016 2,333 Stub--Coin945 (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iteris company request: financial results and acquisition

Hello, I'm an employee at Iteris and have taken on the role of making requests on Wikipedia. I have a short request for the Iteris page to update financial results, add mention of an acquisition, and add a key person. The information and sources are here on the Talk page. Help or pointers are appreciated. Best, David Sadeghi at Iteris, Inc. (talk) 19:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David Sadeghi at Iteris, Inc., I'm taking a look. Please write a reminder on my talk page if I have not answered you before 29 June. JBchrch talk 19:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Metals Company

I recently created an article for The Metals Company, formerly DeepGreen Metals, a deep sea mining company. Any help improving the article would be appreciated. Thank you, Thriley (talk) 02:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation Homes

If editors are interested, there is a request to improve the "Overview" section of the Invitation Homes article at Talk:Invitation Homes. Full disclosure: I made this request on behalf of my employer, therefore I have a conflict of interest. Kristi at IH (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help reviewing Tetra Pak article for tag removal

Hello WikiProject Companies. I'm Victor, an employee from Tetra Pak. Over the last couple of months, I have been working with editors to revise content from the article that was promotional in tone. Because of my COI, I suggest revisions and do not edit the article myself. We've made good progress and are looking for an editor who is willing to review the article and weigh in on whether there is anything else we should address before the Advert tag is removed. You can see our discussions about rewriting content at Talk:Tetra Pak. Thanks! Victor at TetraPak (talk) 06:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lexipol Article Updates

Hello editors, I'm User:Mchilds72, an employee of Lexipol. Because of my paid conflict of interest, I am looking for help from interested volunteers in the community to discuss and implement improvements to the current entry for Lexipol. You can learn more about me at my user page, and see my disclosure at Talk:Lexipol where I will make suggestions and provide resources for editors, but I will not edit the article myself. I recently posted an edit request for editors' review, specifically in hopes of improving the article's Public Reaction section. I have provided suggestions and welcome feedback from reviewing editors. I hope that posting here is an acceptable way for me to capture the attention of interested editors and collaborate together. If interested, please review my full request about sourcing updates here. Thanks! Mchilds72 (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]