User talk:Notfrompedro

Hi Notfrompedro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

/* On politics and social issues */ Dr. Adrian Rogers never said the quote about slavery at any time.

To the people who keep removing the edits that have been made. This entire paragraph needs to be removed. It is a fabrication made by a man that wholeheartedly hated Adrian Rogers and is 100% false. I have been editing Adrian Rogers content for almost 18 years, I sat in his church for 11 years and I am surrounded by words that he has spoken, both in print form and in recorded form and can guarantee that he never made such a statement. Even the speech pattern that is quoted is nothing like what Adrian Rogers would say - this is a lie and needs to be removed. Clearly I am not a professional Wiki editor and do not know the route to properly remove this false content. Any assistance in doing so would be greatly appreciated by both myself and the Rogers family and the millions of people that listen to his messages on a daily basis.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred Matthews (talk • contribs)

This is what the article talk page is for. There is already a discussion there but there is a consensus there that the section is referenced and verifiable. If you have a conflict of interest you especially should be limiting yourself to the talk page. Notfrompedro (talk) 11:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Kate Dillon Levin page

Hi notfrompedro thank you for the edits to my page - I'd like to submit some more edits for your review. How do I do this? LucyJean74 (talk) 23:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)lucyjean74

@LucyJean74: The talk page of the article itself is the place to suggest things with full transparency. Your suggestions don't need my personal review as I hold no more authority than the next editor. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Notfrompedro

I appreciate you putting my post back up...

However, I took it down cause there is no point to it anymore... They just don't want to listen and now I have 2 people against me on this.

So again, thanks but it's pointless. Maurice Mo Jordan (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

If you feel that a conversation is pointless then you cease to participate in it. You don't blank the talk page. If everyone else in the conversation opposes your view then quite possibly your view is incorrect. Wikipedia works on consensus so people have to attempt to engage with each other. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

No one wants to even consider this. They are showing images from 1975 for crying out loud. Look, they are not interested, they want a RC, even though Weberman & Canfield are fair from reliable sources. So it's kind of useless. Maybe you don't get what I'm saying or maybe you want to keep it up as some payback. Not sure but it's not going to amount to anything. You say I DON'T black the talk page? Why is that? On my recent post they did this... "The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it." so.. yeah, I think I can blank it. Maurice Mo Jordan (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

You cannot blank the talk page. See WP:TALKO. Closing a discussion is not the same thing as blanking the content and the reason for closing the discussion was explained to you: No original research. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

No, I'm DONE with this... Stop bring it back up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maurice Mo Jordan (talk • contribs)

Then walk away but you don't get to deleted content on your way out. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

No, the admin can do it and THAT is what they will do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maurice Mo Jordan (talk • contribs)

Closing a discussion isn't the same thing as deleting comments. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Editing Company Page: Kitchen Stuff Plus

Notfrompedro, I am having a difficult time editing my company page. I am simply trying to add the company history - I don't understand how that is considered promotional or why you keep removing it? I am not sure how to site it, seeing as there aren't textbooks or articles indicating how the company was started. Same as raising funds for different causes, how is this promotional? It is simply stating community involvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.146.70.36 (talk • contribs)

@184.146.70.36: If it is your company than you have a conflict of interest. According to WP:COIEDIT, you should disclose your COI and propose changes on talk pages. Stating community involvement serves one purpose: to make the company look good which is promotional editing. Wikipedia requires articles to have reliable sources that are verifiable to readers. If you cannot cite a source then the information doesn't belong in the article. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Uthiyur page

I am very well knowledgable in that subject of article Uthiyur. Almost all are good. You may only find little parts to be not good. Please don't remove large parts or revert it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.42.81 (talk • contribs)

@111.92.42.81: None of it is "good" because it all depends on references that are not reliable sources. YouTube videos of monkeys, Wikis that anyone can edit, and commercial travel sites are not acceptable sources. Wikipedia is not a tourism website. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Anti-Hindu Sentiment

Three people have deleted my proposed corrections, all with verified sources and new content that is factually correct. There are no reasonable explanations. It appears to be gatekeeping and if you allow sources like SASAC who are in the centre of hostility and politicisation, regarding scholars who are misquoted and smeared, it is clinical bias. I take issue with that as Wikipedia is supposed to be impartial. This page is inaccurate and hostile. Jnanashuddhi (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jnanashuddhi: It was explained every single time in the edit summaries. Article talk pages are for discussing ways to improve the article. They aren't a place for you to write a whole new article because you are angry that the page is protected. You are attempting to evade the protection by just ramming your own version through via the talk page. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

A. There is no explanation aside from 'unconstructive'. B. The article is inaccurate and your editors have deleted the evidence that I provided for that three times. C. I did not write a whole new article, I wrote new content for the existing one. D. I requested a new page because the anti-Hindu sentiment page has an automatic redirection from Hinduphobia. E. Suggesting 'you are just angry that the page is protected' and suggesting it is about 'ramming my own version through' is highly offensive. Your entry is dishonest. It needs to be corrected urgently.Jnanashuddhi (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jnanashuddhi: Look at the edit summaries here. I know you saw them because you keep going to that history page to hit "undo". When you go accusing other people of having a bias based on nothing more than disliking the content of an article then you don't get to complain about it being "highly offensive" for someone to talk about your intentions. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

I do get to complain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Anti-Hindu_SentimentJnanashuddhi (talk) 18:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Good luck. Dispute resolution is for helping people discuss things. You don't seem to want to discuss: you want to make demands and cast aspersions about other people being biased because they don't agree with you. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

International Free Expression Project

Hi Notfrompedro, I wanted to just point out that I brought back some of the changes after your revision in the [International Free Expression Project] article. I'd made them after the promotional language was added because I didn't notice the promotional language (or I would have reworked the language myself). The changes were to the infobox, some grammar, deleting the orphan label and adding categories.

I mostly wanted to flag these changes so you don't think I was undoing your reverting -- just some of it that I think was unintentionally caught up in the reversion. Let me know, though, if there is any issue with some of the edits I just made/brought back. Thank you! Ddramacat (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Ddramacat

@Ddramacat: You claim to be employed by International Free Expression Project as per WP:COIEDIT you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly and instead you should propose changes on talk pages. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Remove some parts of article

hi Notfrompedro, you removed some parts of this article Javad Foroughi. as you know and see the refrence is related to an Israel website and iran has a vs to Israel. please check the article and if it needs to be completed please complete it. thank you.007saeed

@007saeed: You think because the reference is Israeli that is a valid reason to just deleted the content? It is not. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

You are frivously editing/rolling back content on numerous articles for no apparent reason other than because you can. This Talk page is littered with other editors who seem to have the same issue with you. Continuing with this nonsense can get you banned from Wikipedia - a space where readers are trusting editors to make information more reliable. Quit being a bonehead!72.174.131.123 (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@72.174.131.123: You have been jumping IPs to add hoax content and disrupt articles. Your edits remove referenced content which is vandalism. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

undone my edits

I am sorry Notfrompedro, but i did not intend to promote any website, just that Indian LGBT organisations had less representation in the page, hence i did so. Please discuss about the edit gently, and not just give such notices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prerak k (talk • contribs)

You do know better because you have been reverted and blocked for doing the same thing multiple times. Creating new socks to continue the same behavior will just lead to more blocks. Notfrompedro (talk) 11:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_remailer

YAMN is a working remailer system. Have a look at at the references and to the Yamn pinger https://tincture.ws/pinger/classic/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.159.6.25 (talk • contribs)

There are many working remailer systems. Your edit removed a valid "citations needed" tag and consisted of unreferenced promotional text which is identical to Draft:YAMN so clearly you are also the other IP that was adding YAMN content to the article. Both the draft and your edit were copyvios of this page and have been tagged accordingly. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

As my English is not good, I suggest that you or an other person could rewrite the article about YAMN that he will satisfy the wiki requirements. I only wanted to contribuite informtion to wikipedia. SORRY that I did not do this in the right mannor. This was the first and last time that I will share information to wikipedia.

By the way there are only three working remailer systems: Mixmaster, Cypherpunk and YAMN. Mixminion is dead for many years. If you want to inform yourself more about the remailer community I suggest that you read https://groups.google.com/g/alt.privacy.anon-server. Besides a lot of SPAM (unfortunately) you will find a lot of information here.

> so clearly you are also the other IP that was adding YAMN content to the article. My router automatic changes the IP regular.

SORRY that I did work to you.

79.159.6.25 (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

ISU

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note "usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc." - Cabayi (talk) 16:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Abdullah Al-Nafisi

Hi Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 14:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Gazeteci Sabah 1453: Yes? Notfrompedro (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

why did you delete my edit? What is your source? I am an Arab and I know English. Is your source Al Arabiya TV, which is supported by the Saudi and Emirati regime, which hates Dr. Al-Nafisi?! also He is a prominent Kuwaiti politician who is accused by Saudi Arabia and the UAE regime of this accusations because his political positions Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 14:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

We should be neutral on Wikipedia :) Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Gazeteci Sabah 1453: If you are talking about this edit your reasoning was your personal view that "Al-Arabiya channel hates the prominent Kuwaiti politician Al-Nafisi" which isn't valid. The content was referenced and if you take issue with the reference then use the article talk page and discuss it. Stop deleting information because you don't like it. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes, Al-Arabiya is supported by the Saudi and Emirati regimes first, and they hate Al-Nafisi because of his political positions, of course. We should not write partial words from an interview with someone Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

The source talks about partial words from Dr Al-Nafisi interviews, only if you watched the entire interview, you will find a big difference Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Gazeteci Sabah 1453: Like I said WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't a valid reason to censor content. Please use the article talk page to discuss the content of the article. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi

also Are you interested in writing about a prominent Turkish journalist, writer and translator? Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Gazeteci Sabah 1453: Why do you keep going to people's talk pages and asking them if they want to write about a Turkish translator? Are you trying to get someone to write your biography for you? Notfrompedro (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

I am From Kuwait :) Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 15:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Gazeteci Sabah 1453: That didn't answer the question. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

I am not turkish person ok ? T Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Gazeteci Sabah 1453: That still doesn't answer my question. Why do you keep going to people's talk pages and asking them if they want to write about a Turkish translator? Notfrompedro (talk) 15:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Because I think he's notable Gazeteci Sabah 1453 (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/علي_أبو_عمر The never-ending quest. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

It's because all of the regular & draft pages with his name have been semi- or extended-protected and he can't write the article himself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:24, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 06:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

about deleting my edit

Hello, I am from Afghanistan

Unfortunately, today I saw that on Wikipedia and on the Afghanistan page, my country's flag and logo have been changed to the flag of the Taliban terrorist group that has occupied the country. This is a great shame for the great media of Wikipedia.

Please do not support terrorists.

To be honest, I wanted to change that photo, but it was locked and I had to edit ten first, and then in four days I could change the Afghanistan page on Wikipedia. For this reason, I just wanted to make ten quick changes to get permission to change locked pages. Can you help me and change the picture of Afghanistan page? It was a big mistake to approve this change. Artmojtabaa (talk) 16:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

@Artmojtabaa: I haven't edited the Afghanistan article and simply reverted this edit of yours as it was unreferenced (WP:BLP requires references for statements about living people) and it consisted of personal views (MOS:EDITORIAL). Adding a series of unreferenced additions to articles just to be able to edit another article isn't a good use of everyone else's time. You can always use the talk page of the Afghanistan article to discuss the issue. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Quick note for {{copyvio-revdel}}

Hey - thank you for helping keep Wikipedia free of copyright violations, your efforts are really appreciated! Just a quick note, when adding the revisions to be revision-deleted, you only need to enter the ID and not the entire URL (see my edit). Many thanks, and keep up the great work ~TNT (she/they • talk) 06:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

@TheresNoTime: Thank you! That makes it much easier. Notfrompedro (talk) 11:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

ESSAR Steel India Limited page deletation

Hi, Trying to delete the ESSAR Steel India Limited page because AM/NS India has merged with ESSAR Steel India Limited. So now it's not standing alone anymore. I am wishing to remove all the ESSAR Steel pages linked with the above-mentioned page. For the same, I am facing the issue to delete it by using the Proposed deletion process as it's showing "This page must be substituted" even after following all the steps. I request you to delete the ESSAR Steel India Limited page and the other ESSAR Pages linked with it. Thank you.