Jump to content

User talk:RajsharmaBond007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RajsharmaBond007 (talk | contribs) at 06:58, 5 September 2021 (status change). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

May 2021

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Micromouse. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raj kumar Sharma

Information icon Hello, RajsharmaBond007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Raj kumar Sharma, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please note that in accordance to our conflict of interest editing guidelines, I have moved your article to Draft:Raj kumar Sharma, as editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. When you are ready to submit the draft for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. Thank you. Template:Z204Sdrqaz (talk) 10:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page move of AICRA

Given that you were already made aware of our conflict of interest editing guidelines, you should know that editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. Please stop creating that page in the mainspace; I have moved it to Draft:AICRA. When you are ready to submit the draft for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. Thank you. Template:Z204Sdrqaz (talk) 15:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for suggestion. will do the same RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TECHNOXIAN moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TECHNOXIAN, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Celestina. will the same. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AICRA (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Timtrent, All links referred in my article is from reputed national newspapers, websites and TV. Do you expect more of it? Kindly check the links or specify.
Also as per my understanding, I have removed inline links. If there is any mistake, kindly specify. thx RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 07:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RajsharmaBond007! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TECHNOXIAN (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Umakant Bhalerao, I believe you have not gone through the article properly. If you consider information of an organization as advertisement then everything on Wikipedia is advertisement. Also all reference links mentioned are from reputed national newspapers or TV. I believe these resources should be acceptable. In case of any disconnect, kindly be specific in your concern. thx RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technoxian (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Youtube is not a valid reference
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 07:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have mailed to photosubmission@wikimedia.org and attached the trade mark certificate issued by Government of India. Hope it serves the purpose. Thx RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FutureTech Media moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FutureTech Media, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for suggestion. I've added few verified links to support article. Hope its sufficient enough for my submission. thx. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 06:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FutureTech Media (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. youtube videos and press releases are inadmissible.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 07:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FutureTech Media (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:36, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have sent mail to photosubmission@wikimedia.org and attached Title certificate issued by government of India for the same. Hope it serve the purpose. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technoxian (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mr. Sahaib,
I have gone through all policy guidelines of Wikipedia before submitting the article. Somehow I feel that it has become a practice of reviewers to simply comment saying that submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. I dont know the reasons what is reviewer's benefit in this. All my links and citations are from reliable sources including wikipedia listed National news agencies and government proofs. Either pl check all references then comment or give specific reasons/concerns. thx. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technoxian (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 01:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Information icon

Hello RajsharmaBond007. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RajsharmaBond007. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RajsharmaBond007|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 12:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make your declaration correctly FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 12:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've already mailed trademark registration to Wikipedia commons. pl check. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 06:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RajsharmaBond007&oldid=1042485446"