Talk:Trump Force One

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trump Force One article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 April 2016. The result of the discussion was merge to List of things named after Donald Trump.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Template:WikiProject Donald Trump

Info seems old

The aircraft is evidently still flying, despite the end of the campaign and despite President Trump using a Boeing VC-25 as Air Force One now.

So... need updated info.

97.104.70.92 (talk) 06:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It being a company aircraft like thousands of others doesnt need to be any additional text. The only thing that would be of note is if Trump is actually using it while President, but you would need a reliable source for that. MilborneOne (talk) 09:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No corporate aircraft I've ever heard of has had such indepth sustained long term coverse as Trump Force One, even long before Trump ran for president. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saw it sitting at LaGuardia a week ago (June 2018). I'm sure it still gets used for his family/business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.195.3.64 (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just N757AF?

The Trump Organization has at least four aircraft, I believe - the 757, a Citation or maybe two, and at least a pair of Sikorsky S-76 helicopters. Is this page purportedly just about one of them? I'm not sure why this is notable or should be separate from the Trump Organization's or maybe Donald Trump's page. 69.200.226.19 (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Echo chamber

Found in https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/from-air-force-one-to-trump-force-one/: Trump Force One is an informal name for The Trump Organization’s private jet, comparing it with Air Force One, originally used by Donald Trump. The name was coined before Trump became president of the United States and was in use by his supporters during his presidential campaign of 2016. The current version of Trump Force One is a Boeing 757 registered N757AF, which replaced a Boeing 727. It is operated as part of “Trump Air”, the air assets of The Trump Organization. (Source: Wikipedia) Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 16:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content possibly in need of additional action

On September 5, 2021, text was added to a reference footnote. It appears to me that the text is mere opinion unsupported by the citation and more importantly may be libelous regarding a living person or persons. I am about to revert that edit, but I don't think that potential libel should remain even in the history.100.36.75.182 (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]