Jump to content

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 January 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:07, 16 October 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Leo Stolz (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

The subject, Leo Stolz, is a soccer player. Since the prior AfD, he won the Hermann Trophy as the top college soccer player in the United States and signed a professional contract with the New York Red Bulls of Major League Soccer. Thus, if nothing else, he satisfies WP:NCOLLATH now. I am requesting that we allow re-creation based on the draft at User:Metropolitan90/Leo Stolz. (This draft was primarily created by other editors including User:Elopez76, but it's in my userspace temporarily.) I did ask the prior deleting admin if he would support restoring the article to the mainspace, but I haven't heard back from him yet. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:24, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Allow recreation - I suppose we could wait until March 6 when the regular season starts, at which point he'll likely meet the requirements of WP:NFOOTY, but why bother? He probably passes WP:GNG as it stands and it certainly looks like he meets the requirements of WP:NCOLLATH. He only needs to meet one of those. We have a sensible draft and a good-faith request from an editor in good standing. If this needs 7 days I'd be surprised. Stlwart111 09:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Allow re-creation - substantial new sources mean the old AfD is no longer applicable, and subject appears to meet WP:N, and at least one of its crums. WilyD 09:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Allow recreation as original closer. I was away for a couple days giving a workshop, and just saw this. More or less per Stalwart111. My apologies for not responding quickly enough to avoid the extra step here. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.