Jump to content

Talk:Terry McAuliffe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 70.191.130.23 (talk) at 19:38, 26 October 2021 (→‎Misleading in the education section: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GreenTech

The state of Mississippi lost millions of dollars investing in GreenTech Automotive. According to one report, GreenTech reportedly owes the state of Mississippi $2.85 million, even after making an overdue $150,000 loan payment. [1] Patrick McCarthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFAA:7110:2C5D:398:3E88:9369 (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Cleanup required

This article, for some reason, repeats the subject's surname in almost every single sentence. In the first subsection, for example:

In 1985, McAuliffe helped found the Federal City National Bank, a Washington, D.C.–based local bank. In January 1988, when McAuliffe was thirty years old, the bank's board elected McAuliffe as chairman, making him the youngest chairman in the United States Federal Reserve Bank's charter association. In 1991, McAuliffe negotiated a merger with Credit International Bank, which he called his "greatest business experience." McAuliffe became the vice-chairman of the newly merged bank.

That is a paragraph of four sentences, in which his surname is repeated five times. As far as I can see the entire article is written like this. So, I've added a cleanup tag, requesting that it be written in normal English: in about 80% of cases, the surname should be replaced by a pronoun. 51.6.138.24 (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Around 70 McAuliffes have been changed to personal pronouns. Please restore the service tag if you think more should be done. Cheers! --Woko Sapien (talk) 16:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar mistake

There's a grammar mistake in the education section that should read 'vetoed' not 'voted' for. I can't correct it because the page is locked. 70.191.130.23 (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the mistake's been corrected since. Feel free to suggest any other improvements you can think of. Cheers! --Woko Sapien (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading in the education section

It says the supposed book ban bill was supported by Republicans and social conservatives when in fact about half of Democrats voted for it along with the Republican majority at the time. It's misleading as it stands. 70.191.130.23 (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]