Talk:Terry McAuliffe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
 
WikiProject Virginia (Rated B-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Syracuse, New York (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syracuse, New York, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syracuse, New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Discussion of content[edit]

I invite users who have been removing content, citing non-existent consensus, to discuss the material here. Instaurare (talk) 21:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

The fact is these are the same types of edits decided against on this very talk page last year. They are a daily negative play by play on a BLP page that is an obvious hit job full of commentary and opinion. To say there is a non-existent consensus when more than a few people have reverted these edits is silly. I'm sorry, but your history on this page proves you can't keep a NPOV. Your editing style would make this the longest page on Wikipedia as the tiniest of details and commentary are continuously being included - and for whatever reason, only include negative events and tone. There is no objectivity in these edits, and they violate the spirt in in which Wikipedia is supposed to exist. I have cited a few problems with these edits that violate Wiki guidelines and I could probably list off a dozen more, but given that there is a clear consensus against the content you have added on this page over the course of over a year and again over the course of the last couple of months the issues are overwhelmingly obvious. BallotLine (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Completely agree with your assessment. Buzzards-Watch Me Work (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)