Draft:Technoblade
| Submission declined on 26 June 2021 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per CSD G13. Declined by Theroadislong 3 years ago. Last edited by 静けさ 2 years ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
|  |
| Submission declined on 20 June 2021 by Devonian Wombat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Devonian Wombat 3 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 16 April 2021 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Robert McClenon 3 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 March 2021 by AngusWOOF (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by AngusWOOF 3 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 March 2021 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by HitroMilanese 3 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 January 2021 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by HitroMilanese 3 years ago. | |
Comment: This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion. You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.This draft does not establish significant coverage of the subject. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: This does not need a detailed log of weekly events participated like this. Needs more external news sources covering the subject to show notability. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Please see WP:GNG and WP:ENT. YouTube is not a reliable source. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are necessary to demonstrate notability. Hitro talk 07:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
| Technoblade | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal information | |||||||||||||
| Born | 1 June 1999 | ||||||||||||
| Nationality | American | ||||||||||||
| Occupation | Youtuber | ||||||||||||
| YouTube information | |||||||||||||
| Also known as | Techno, Technothepig, StudioLORE | ||||||||||||
| Channels | |||||||||||||
| Years active | 2009-present | ||||||||||||
| Genre | Gaming | ||||||||||||
| Subscribers |
(6/11/2021 at 10:51:50 UTC -4 or EDT) | ||||||||||||
| Total views |
(6/11/2021 at 10:51:50 UTC -4 or EDT) | ||||||||||||
| Associated acts | TommyInnit • Wilbur Soot • Dream • MrBeast • DanTDM • Tubbo • RTGame • VoiceoverPete | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Last updated: 6/11/2021 at 10:51:50 UTC -4 or EDT | |||||||||||||
Technoblade (born 1998/1999) is an American YouTuber who is known primarily for creating Minecraft content.[1][2][3][4] He is known for his skills and strategy in Minecraft PvP and has a friendly rivalry with fellow Minecraft YouTuber and Twitch streamer Dream.[3][4]
Career
YouTube
Technoblade created his Youtube account on October 28, 2013,[5] where its first upload would be on October 31, 2013.[6] Prior to creating his current channel, he had an unsuccessful channel named StudioLORE.[7][8]
Minecraft competitions
Technoblade is a four-time Minecraft Monday winner and a two-time Minecraft Championship (MCC) champion.[1] In the ten MCC events he has competed in, Technoblade has never finished outside of the top 10 in individual scoring and the teams has been on have never placed below sixth in the total rankings.[9]
Personal life
Technoblade's real name is Dave.[2] He has ADHD.[3]
On August 28, 2021, Technoblade uploaded a video revealing that he was diagnosed with cancer after having pain in his right arm on August 2.[1][2]
References
- ^ a b c Michael, Cale (2021-08-27). "Minecraft content creator Technoblade announces he has been diagnosed with cancer". Dot Esports. Retrieved 2021-09-06.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b c Gatollari, Mustafa (2021-08-29). "Technoblade Just Revealed to His Fans Why He's Been Absent From Uploading". Distractify. Retrieved 2021-09-06.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b c Nightingale, Ed (2021-04-15). "Death threats sent to Minecraft YouTuber Technoblade for alleged racist tweets". PinkNews. Retrieved 2021-09-06.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b Knight, Kyle. "Did Tommyinnit And Technoblade Just April Fools Prank Us All?". DualShockers. Retrieved 2021-09-06.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Technoblade's YouTube Stats (Summary Profile)". Social Blade. Retrieved May 4, 2021.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "technoblade vs mineplex's owner". November 1, 2013. Retrieved 2021-04-17.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "StudioLORE's YouTube Stats (Summary Profile)". Social Blade. Retrieved May 4, 2021.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "StudioLORE – YouTube". YouTube. Retrieved August 16, 2021.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Michael, Cale (2021-05-29). "Why is Technoblade not competing in Minecraft Championships (MCC) 14, Season 2?". Dot Esports. Retrieved 2021-09-06.