User talk:Arjayay
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
E-mails
You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.
Broadcasted
The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B
Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".
A November 2021 search for Broadcast gave over 221,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 88.
Of these 88, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 14 refer to a 2015 Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations.
DYK for Lation Scott
On 9 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lation Scott, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lynching of Lation Scott took more than three hours while thousands watched? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lation Scott. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lation Scott), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Don't put any wrong statement in article.
I just want raise a concern over a statement which I think edited by you in that statement you put awadhi as a native language of Azamgarh in "Azamgarh District" page which is totally a false claim in fact Azamgarh falls into a bhojpuri region where majority of people are bhojpuri speakers. If you ever saw mens speaking awadhi in azamgarh they are just migrants from neighbouring district like sultanpur, Ambedkar Nagar etc. If you still have any doubt just check these survey reports 1. "Linguistic Survey Of India" By George Abraham Grierson 2. "C-16 Population By Mother Tongue" By Census of India 2409:4063:6D82:7BD5:0:0:80B:5C0A (talk) 03:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, reverting changes (that are also referenced), removing new logo and the logo history, replacing references with unworking links, change the name company and so more is vandalism. You must pay attenction.--151.24.97.94 (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)