Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindy Carlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mindy Carlin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual involved in minor local political actions lacking independent, in-depth, non-trivial support. References lacking independence, are single line mentions, do not even mention article subject, or are unrelated to article subject. Article is a long resume/advertisement. It appears the author believes adding unrelated or single line mentions will create WP:N. reddogsix (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- back to basics: why include this person in an encyclopedia? Because she got in trouble for a $300 dinner tab? Every other mention is she represented or she moderated. I don't hear that she did anything. Citations are insufficient to substantiate claims. Misleading use of wikilinks: public affairs is not a synonymous with public administration. Rhadow (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete political professional. spokesman, lobbyist. Article is overstuffed with sources in which she merely speaks on behalf of an organization that she works for. And with facts sources to public records, like her birth. I removed a bio section that had many sources, but they were all to thinks like public office real estate sales (when she bought a house.) the only source i see on the page that has anything INDEPTH about her is: Lobbyist confirmed for Loudoun health post, Washington Post 2009. I am not seeing notability here.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficent coverage in enough reliable sources of any depth or persistence to pass WP:ANYBIO: From little to nothing under her own name, and press-releases and other cruft under her working name. The latter being so much more common has many hits for other people called that, but few for her. — fortunavelut luna 15:31, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indepth in reliable press to determine notability of subject of the article.Celestina007 (talk) 18:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all- This is one of the first articles I worked on. From the guidance I've received on this from more experienced users, I went through and removed sections that were trivial or poorly sourced. This experience has helped me learn about what requirements exist for notability. Additional feedback would be useful for me moving forward. Thank you! Thsmi002 (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.