Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Environmentalist (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Environmentalist (magazine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. Not seeing anything that is not a primary source. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. Seems an obvious course of action for a two-line article on that institute's magazine. --Michig (talk) 10:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. I was unable to find multiple in-depth reliable sources for the magazine and was unable to find it in selective indexes. It seems to fail both WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. There seems to be a Springer journal with a similar name, this one is published by IEMA. Nonetheless, this magazine's existence and mission are verifiable at the IEMA website and as the mouthpiece for the IEMA, it belongs that article. --Mark viking (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 01:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect as others have said. This is clearly a bulletin/newsletter, not a substantial academic journal. Peterkingiron (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.