Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cat video games
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 16:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- List of cat video games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The lead starts of with an arbitrary distinction: a list of video games which strongly feature cats, other felines and anthropomorphic feline characters. That's WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Too specific topic to even have a list. WP:INDISCRIMINATE. --TL22 (talk) 00:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - An indiscriminate list of information. Possibly too broad of a list: does Pokémon count given that several cat Pokémon such as Meowth, Skitty, Glameow, and Meowstic exist? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment As an aside, I initially thought this AfD was an April Fools joke when I saw it in the table of contents for the April 1 log, then I saw the relisting comment. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, no, this is a real one. :) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.