User talk:Rymknows23

Welcome!

Hi Rymknows23! I noticed your contributions to Food Tech and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Melmann 09:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Foodbeeper.png

Thanks for uploading File:Foodbeeper.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FoodBeeper

The article FoodBeeper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article by WP:SPA

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My article is not promotional. All the sources I've so far cited are independent and verifiable. Also, I believe my POV is not in any way biased, nor am I violating the COI policy. Precisely, the topic is part of my niche interest; Algerian economy and digital growth, a category rarely covered and dealt with here on Wikipedia. So it's unfair that an article that most certainly adds to a wiki project gets deleted. Rymknows23

FoodBeeper moved to draftspace

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’ve submitted FoodBeeper for review, can you remove the Advertisement tag! I thought I made it clear that I have no business promoting the brand, it just happens that it is a major proof of Algeria’s digital and technological growth,which is my main interest. I agree that the references may not back me up since they’re mostly in French and Arabic (Algeria’s main languages), but they’re reliable, according to Wikipedia policies. Does that make my topic unworthy of being on Wikipedia? Regards, Rymknows23 (talk) 09:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC) Rymknows23[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FoodBeeper(2) (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at FoodBeeper instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FoodBeeper(2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FoodBeeper(2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rymknows23! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:FoodBeeper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FoodBeeper. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! I appreciate your help. I'll try to remove all the errors. Regards, Rymknows23 (talk) 13:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:FoodBeeper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FoodBeeper. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 13:25, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FoodBeeper (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I haven't evaluated all of the sources, but 8, 9, 14, and 17 are all unreliable. 18 and 6 have nothing to do with the article, 2 is a paywall, and the rest aren't in English. Please remember that every article needs in-depth and independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FoodBeeper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FoodBeeper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Foodbeeper.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Foodbeeper.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:FoodBeeper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FoodBeeper. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for taking the time to review my article. I edited it, precisely, I removed the unsourced statements, unreliable sources, and fixed the promotional tone. Could you please review it again? ~~~~ Rymknows23 (talk) 11:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:FoodBeeper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FoodBeeper. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for taking the time to review my article. I edited it. Precisely, I removed all the unreliable sources. I'd appreciate it if you could review it again. Thanks, ~~~~ Rymknows23 (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rymknows23! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, my article has been declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rymknows23! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is a verified Facebook page considered a reliable source?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]