Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaborator (software) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:02, 20 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No further discussion despite two relists SoWhy 08:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborator (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable product, failing WP:GNG Andyjsmith (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Power~enwiki. I have recently added an independent Analyst Note (source 3) for additional validation of Collaborator's notability. In addition, please view the "List of tools for code review" article on Wikipedia for an understanding of how Collaborator is the name of the software and SmartBear is the maintainer, therefore, I don't believe that merging the two articles would be beneficial. If you have any suggestions on how I can further update this page, please let me know. Thank you! Eugene450 (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.