Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Puerto Rico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of people on the postage stamps of Puerto Rico[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Standard "list of people on the postage stamps of X" list. This is woefully incomplete, and while sources are added, there is still no proof of meeting WP:SALAT. The sources given prove that these people were on the stamp, but not that it's a topic worthy of attention. And since when are "gubernatorial election" and "Puerto Rican flag" people? Obligatory ping of @Fram: and @Johnpacklambert: Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Puerto Rico. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is something for another kind of project, outside of Wikipedia. BD2412 T 21:48, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is the type of list that Wikia is meant for creating. It does not fit within Wikipedia which has notability requirements for all articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence whatsoever exists that this does meet WP:NLIST. Otherwise, this and all similar pages fail WP:NOTDIRECTORY (as generally "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists as a reason to keep having them even when they fail inclusion criteria), as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication how this kind of page is of any broader encyclopedic significance. An encyclopedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, even if it is true, and despite it possibly being interesting to a limited number of dedicated philatelical enthusiasts. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This list is mainly not what it claims to be. About half the list is people who never appeared on Puerto Rican stamps. That lf oddly includes the flag of Puerto Rico. Which is not a person at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.