Talk:Battle of Elephant Point
Battle of Elephant Point has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Elephant Point/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I'll be doing the GA review for this article, and I should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Is there are reason that the operation code names are bolded in the Background section?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The article looks great, so I'm going to pass it to GA status. I had one minor question regarding formatting, but it's not enough to hold up the GA nomination over. Congrats and keep up the good work! Dana boomer (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks! I usually bold operation names so that they're seen more clearly. Skinny87 (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Wrong dates?
Heya! I was digging thru some of my great grandmothers old things and came across a photo with my great grandfather. He was in the Indian 44th division and the text at the bottom of the photo says.
“The capture of the Elephant Point defences at the mouth of the Rangoon river by units of the 2nd (then 44th) Indian airborne division: 6th May 1945
The dates on the wiki all point to May 1st could this be in error? 2A00:23C6:6F0D:8601:601D:660:23B3:45AB (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class Indian history articles
- Low-importance Indian history articles
- GA-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles