Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragy Thomas (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sprinklr. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ragy Thomas

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renomination after the author of the page was blocked for sockpuppetry (as I was suspecting). Seems to fail WP:ANYBIO. 多少战场龙 (talk) 08:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. Loads and loads of interviews discovered on a Google cse search and before on the web, that confirm he exists per WP:V but no secondary sourcing. Lots of lots of interviews. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 08:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Fails WP:SIGCOV but this subject is notable and this article is supported with generally reliable sources NYT and Forbes. Lilsusanalex (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Sock strike Girth Summit _(blether) 18:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Kerala, and New Jersey. Skynxnex (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge and~~ Redirect to Sprinklr - I have reconsidered my !vote from the previous AfD in light of WP:NBUSINESSPERSON and the limited amount of independent and reliable content currently available to support WP:BASIC, including based on another search for sources. Beccaynr (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)- !vote updated after further review of sources, including sources noted in the previous AfD discussion; the creation of a redirect seems reasonable because of biographical information in the Sprinklr article, but I also have no objection to first deleting this article before the redirect is created. Beccaynr (talk) 19:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reviewed the sources, I don't think there's a case for GNG here. Oaktree b (talk) 15:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sprinklr Basic information about this person in relation to the founding of the company is already at the target article. Joyous! | Talk 18:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:BASIC; sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP per review of available source. Not a fan of redirecting BLP names to corporate entities -- the target article may be redirected itself, and the name just hangs there. Therefore, I prefer deletion. --K.e.coffman (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.