User talk:Boca Jóvenes
There are a lot of us who just want to work on articles.
I won't name her and possibly embarrass her, but she is right.
Working on articles is rewarding. Going round in circles is not.
So, unless you ask me a direct question or you need my help with a specific article, this editor is boycotting all discussions.
Nothing personal, but silence is golden.
Welcome!
|
Hello there,
I see that you reverted my edit to 1774 English cricket season. If the page was correct before, does it still need copyediting and is it still in use? If not, I will remove the associated templates.
Thank you. ContributeToTheWiki (talk) 14:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, yourself. Hope you are okay. The templates can be removed now although I'll still be working on the article, mainly to convert the table into narrative. Thanks for your help and all the best. BcJvs UTC 14:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Boca Jóvenes!
Boca Jóvenes,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Abishe. That's really kind. We just settled for a quiet drink or two (or three) at midnight but it was very enjoyable. Let's see what 2023 brings. I hope you had a good New Year yourself and I wish you all the best in 2023. Thanks again. BcJvs UTC 12:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Boca Jóvenes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:Girth Summit|Girth Summit]], your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several [[WP:GA|good articles]], rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? [[User:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:blue"><b><i>Bc</i></b></span>]][[User talk:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:red"><b><i>Jvs</i></b></span>]] UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Girth Summit|Girth Summit]], your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several [[WP:GA|good articles]], rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? [[User:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:blue"><b><i>Bc</i></b></span>]][[User talk:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:red"><b><i>Jvs</i></b></span>]] UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Girth Summit|Girth Summit]], your message says the account "has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse". Please show me when, where and how this account has been used abusively. I would say it has been used constructively for the creation of several [[WP:GA|good articles]], rescuing many other articles which needed repair, etc., etc. Can you really afford to lose editors who perform 12k edits with results like those? [[User:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:blue"><b><i>Bc</i></b></span>]][[User talk:Boca Jóvenes|<span style="color:red"><b><i>Jvs</i></b></span>]] UTC 13:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}