Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 28

December 28

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 28, 2022.

Brandy cocktail

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of cocktails#Brandy. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brandy cocktail → Cocktail (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Any of these would be preferable: Sidecar (cocktail), Brandy Alexander, Metropolitan (cocktail). Perhaps a Dab? Chumpih ^t 21:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dabify per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of cocktails#Brandy, which lists more brandy-based cocktails like the ones mentioned. Duckmather (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Chumpih ^t 14:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of cocktails#Brandy. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trans Sexuality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Transgender sexuality. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trans Sexuality → Slutever (TV series) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There's some argument for a WP:DIFFCAPS split here relative to Trans sexuality, but the current target is based on a single episode of a relatively obscure TV series (800 views/month for the article), and if I Google the phrase, the first result capitalized that way is a video by Stef Sanjati, not this episode of Slutever. I think it's much more likely that people typing "Trans Sexuality" are looking for the topic of transgender sexuality and just capitalizing it "wrong" (not really wrong, just inconsistent with WP:AT); I suggest retargeting to Transgender sexuality and adding Slutever to the hatnote there. Trans Sexuality (Slutever) can be created in place of the current redirect. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Page creator here. I've created a redirect using a disambiguator for the Slutever episode and I have no problem with Trans Sexuality redirecting users to Trans sexuality. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anti-Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural keep. Intended subject, Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States, deleted under WP:CSD G7. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 23:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States → Anti-Mormonism (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is the correct title. I did something unintelligent and then corrected it by moving the redirect. However I've never done this before therefore I don't know how to move without leaving a redirect. Can anyone correct this or explain to me? Thank you. Invasive Spices (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I tagged the redirect (since it wasn't tagged), and correctly formatted the request. I hope that'll help. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 19:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greatly improved Invasive Spices (talk) 28 December 2022 (UTC)

I think what you intended was to nominate Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States for deletion, due to it being the result of a titling error? You can only fix this my moving redirect if you have the ability to suppress redirects, which most users do not (only page movers and admins do). But, you can tag the incorrect redirect for speedy deletion with {{Db-g7}} and an admin will delete it for you, no discussion needed. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Invasive Spices: Does Mdewman6 have that right? If so, I can delete Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States and close this. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mdewman6 is correct. That's easy. Thank you everyone Invasive Spices (talk) 28 December 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

By-wire

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 12#By-wire

Anne of Great Britain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anne of Great Britain → Princess Anne (disambiguation)#British royals (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The most likely wp:primary topic per wp:long-term significance is Anne, Queen of Great Britain. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, in the absence of evidence for primary topic. WikiNav, article traffic and Ngrams are not convincing for me. DrKay (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In terms of a search target, both Queen Anne and the current Princess Royal are likely subjects for a reader to be searching for and I don't think either one is convincingly the primary topic. --Sable232 (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The current Princess Royal has never been called "Anne of Great Britain". The Kingdom of Great Britain has not existed since 1800. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I never said she was; the average Wikipedia reader is not going to make that distinction (at least not before finding the article they're looking for). --Sable232 (talk) 22:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When has Princess Anne ever been referred to as "Anne of Great Britain"? ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[1][2][3][4][5]... I did provide links to google ngrams above. DrKay (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those are all "Princess Anne of Great Britain", not simply "Anne of Great Britain". ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 00:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lily Kershaw

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Kershaw → Nettwerk (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

It seems wrong to redirect from a person to a landing page for a music label. Minimally, it seems to me, if the artist is signed to a label and has several albums, they should have a stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Downes (talk • contribs) 16:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Downes: Please be careful when nominating redirects. This nomination was completely malformed and the redirect was not tagged at all. I've now fixed and tagged this accordingly. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Downes: Fell free to expand it to a stub. Otherwise I think the redirect is fine as it is. --evrik ^(talk) 17:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that the redirect creator has since refined the redirect to Nettwerk#Nettwerk roster (and it's a circular redirect now).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDLINK and to encourage article creation. Without prejudice to creating an article later on if anyone thinks it's needed. Keeping, on the other hand, is unhelpful, as there's no information whatsoever about the subject at the current target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cyclone and nom. Jay 💬 03:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Barbara “Bobo” Sears Rockefeller

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 15:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara “Bobo” Sears Rockefeller → Bobo Rockefeller (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unnecessary inclusion of "nickname" in inverted commas within a redirect title. The author, who has since been blocked, created several other redirects which I accepted and easily suffice as search terms, but this seems unnecessary and without any value. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: It's not a necessarily implausible term, and while I have in the past been supportive of deleting redirects with so called "smart quotes", I have been informed that for many mobile editors and readers of wikipedia, that they can be helpful. Having said that, if it were deleted it would be unlikely to cause any large-scale issues. TartarTorte 14:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For some context, the same editor (who now happens to be blocked) also created the redirects Bobo Sears Rockefeller, Barbara Rockefeller and Barbara Sears Rockefeller, all of which I accepted as they are plausible search/link terms. I don't think this particular one offers the same, if any, value. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per TartarTorte. Unambiguous, potentially useful. A7V2 (talk) 23:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Tartar. Jay 💬 03:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Esoteric Runology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate Odian, delete Runosophy, and no consensus for the rest due to low participation but default to soft delete based on the nomination. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Esoteric Runology → Stephen Flowers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Odian → Stephen Flowers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Odianism → Stephen Flowers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Odinic Runosophy → Stephen Flowers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Rune Gild → Stephen Flowers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Runosophy → Stephen Flowers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These redirects seem to be intended to promote the article rather than accurately redirect the reader. — Skyerise (talk • contribs) 20:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dabify Odian to Yervant Odian and Krikor Odian --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 03:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Runosophy to Runology, Dabify Odian to Yervant Odian and Krikor Odian per Lenticel, and Delete rest. Roost ^T_C(ping me!) 06:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created a dab draft at Odian. Jay 💬 08:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While a draft DAB was just created at Odian, it's still unclear what should be done with the rest of these redirects… Retarget all to the dab, keep, or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The dab is on a surname, and not related to the topic(s) being discussed. There was no suggestion by any participant to retarget any of the redirects to the dab. Jay 💬 12:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jay: I already know that. The suggestions that I made above were made to encourage participants to discuss the other redirects, which were not mentioned by anyone except by Roost who's in favor of deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all except the dabified one due to lack of suitable targets. In particular, the only mention of runosophy in Wikipedia is an undefined passing mention at Nigel Pennick. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ring of regular functions

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4#Ring of regular functions

Sociomedical assessment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sociomedical assessment → Expert witness (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not sure why this was redirected here. "Sociomedical Sciences focus on the social determinants of disease and health and examine the correlation between trends in health and its social causes". This should be deleted or retarged to Social Medicine which is already the target for Sociomedical MB 02:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or write an extra article: Sociomedical assessment is not the same as sociomedical science. It is another term for the work of expert witnessess in the medical field.--Jwdietrich2 (talk) 06:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a near synonym whose relevance would be clear to readers searching for the term. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Arab Armenians

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 5#Arab Armenians

Groat's Disease

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of fictional diseases#Groat's Disease. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Groat's Disease → Curb Your Enthusiasm#Groat's Disease (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Fictional disease from TV show. Redirect to section of an article that doesn't exist Andre🚐 01:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of fictional diseases#Groat's Disease: Mention at List of fictional diseases with context. TartarTorte 02:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per TartarTorte. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of fictional diseases#Groat's Disease per TartarTorte. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of fictional diseases#Groat's Disease where this is discussed. A7V2 (talk) 23:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).