Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kabiller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Kabiller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. A hedge fund manager who is notable in what way?. Also profiles in financial pages, but unknown outside the financial community. Simply non notable. scope_creep 21:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominator's rationale is not in line with WP:GNG. Unknown outside the financial community is not a valid reason for deletion, since wikipedia features of general and specialized encyclopedias. Otherwise Vitamin B12 total synthesis would be non-notable for it's unknown outside the chemists' community.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the area of expertise doesn't particularly matter; it appears there are just enough sources to meet WP:BIO and/or WP:GNG.--Mojo Hand (talk) 03:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.