Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Maxwell (journalist) (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:53, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:53, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- David Maxwell (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability criteria per WP:CREATIVE.
All we currently know is that this person works as a district reporter for the BBC and that he gave a presentation at a TED event. Nothing else part from this has been written about him that would somehow justify notability. Working for the BBC itself does not establish notability, neither does a one off TED presentation. Mootros (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- I find it hard to belive that local journalists on the BBC staff are notable. It is differnet withg senior reporters and editors, who frequentlky appear on national broadcasts. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Peterkingiron. Finnegas (talk) 14:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no there there. Gamaliel (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.