Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sana Ullah Khan Masti Khel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Sana Ullah Khan Masti Khel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not referenced properly

GreenCricket (talk) 11:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: It is definitely referenced properly, i see there is a reference there but i accept that article requires improvement which can be done but the reason provided for deletion is not valid. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I added more refs, more can be added if needed but i think these should be good enough to decline this deletion request. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The individual fulfills the requirement of WP:NOTABILITY.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ^ʞlɐʇ 20:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:19, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Per WP:SKCRIT criteria 1 and criteria 3. Criteria 1 states that a page may be speedily kept if "The nominator...fails to advance an argument for deletion" Criteria 3 states "The nomination is so erroneous that it indicates the nominator has not even read the article in question" which seems to apply here as the subject unquestionably meets the criteria at WP:NPOL as having held national political office. AusLondonder (talk) 08:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, as per AusLondoner. Further, I urge nominator -- please don't participate in the deletion fora until you become familiar with our deletion policies and procedures. Geo Swan (talk) 03:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.