Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pneus Online
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:59, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pneus Online (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability doubtful. Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources not established. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 11:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject is notable through multiple reliable sources quoting it as an international tire retailer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocksdocksz (talk • contribs) 20:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Of the sources, only one was reliable, but that did not have an extensive coverage. I could not verify the reliablity or the extensiveness of the award, but they seemed to be the only other references which check out. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 16:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.