User talk:Bitbopbo

Welcome!

Hello, Bitbopbo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. OccultZone (Talk) 18:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cast sections

Please note that per MOS:TV, prose is preferred to tables. Please do not continue to replace prose in cast sections with tables, as you did at Primeval. If you would like to discuss the use of tables vs prose, please feel free to start a discussion at WT:TV. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bitbopbo, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Bitbopbo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Coronation Street characters. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ThisIsDanny (talk) 13:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ThisIsDanny (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ThisIsDanny (talk) 17:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Britain's Best Sitcom table

Hi Bitbopbo. I've reverted the table you restored on Britain's Best Sitcom because there have been concerns of potential copyright violations when using large data tables. You can check out Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 51#A little different question for background. You may want to open up a discussion at Talk:britain's Best Sitcom or Wikipedia talk:Non-free content to hash out what may or may not be acceptable. Please don't restore the table prior to discussing it since it may put the project at risk. Ish dar ian 12:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring on List of Coronation Street characters

Hi, Do both of you fancy being blocked ? .... If not I strongly suggest you both discuss the Corrie issue on the talkpage,
We all disagree on here but discussing it actually helps you, me and pretty much the entire project!,
Cheers, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 14:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corrie mess

Do you mind? You have made a right mess of the Coronation Street articles. You have no place creating this disruption. Reporting you to an admin.Rain the 1 22:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bitbopbo: The user above does not phrase it diplomatically, but your article moves have indeed caused a mess. Several admins had to do quite a bit of fiddly work to restore the articles after the move war. Your moves do not have consensus and you need to stop doing them and to discuss on talk pages. You should also respond at the AN/I section about your behaviour. Moving pages without consensus is disruptive. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop what you're doing and discuss these changes with other editors. You're on a fast track to getting blocked if you continue with this disruptive behavior. Ish dar ian 17:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to but been ignored and then the user who was involved in the dispute threatened to block me. All I am trying to do is make the pages accurate and If the users who disagreed with me answered my notes I would take into account what they had to say.Bitbopbo (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, you haven't. You have not made on single edit to ANY of the talk pages for the article you want moved. Edit summaries are not to be used to disuss issues you may have with the article. Ish dar ian 17:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, although if edit summaries should be used for discussions, why was it another user threatened to have me blocked in an edit summary, and not a talk page. After this I responded through edit summaries. If the who had reverted my first edit had gone to a talk page, I would have responded. Instead he continued to undo my edits despite being told by other users to stop this. Bitbopbo (talk) 18:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Gail Platt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 5 albert square (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]