User talk:Patricia Meadows

DYK

I nominated your article Simon J. Hall for DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Looking for the appropriate emoticon... Here we go! :-} (lol!) Patricia Meadows (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been accepted for DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Simon J. Hall

On February 17, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Simon J. Hall, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan L. Halperin

Nice work. This might be a good candidate for DYK. ALI ^{nom nom} 16:44, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! *blush* Patricia Meadows (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi there Patricia Meadows, I noticed that you occasionally revert vandalism, and do a good job in doing it. Would you be interested in having rollback rights being granted to your account? Best. Acalamari 20:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I would. Thank you! :) Patricia Meadows (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Best. Acalamari 20:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Palese

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peter Palese, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://knol.google.com/k/peter-palese/-/14p2mu07xc9ro/0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the copyright flag as I believe it is in error. I will fix it if I'm wrong! :-} Patricia Meadows (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged this article as closely paraphrasing some sources as I feel it needs to be revised. I have left an example and some comments on the talk page. In reviewing your other contributions I also noticed that Jonathan L. Halperin also closely follows some sources and so I have tagged it for revision as well. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. I have edited Peter Palese in an effort to address copyright concerns. I have left the paraphrase tag up in case I didn't do enough. Please let me know! (I will address Jonathan L. Halperin next.) Patricia Meadows (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-wrote Jonathan L. Halperin. Again, I left the paraphrase tag in case I didn't go far enough. Please let me know. Thanks. Patricia Meadows (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination on an article you created

There's a concern about Derek Morgan Bush that it falls afoul of our policies on living people, basically an extended version of the notability concern. We avoid having articles on people who are famous for only one event, and while some remain (e.g. Jared Lee Loughner) the general guidance is to include them in other articles. Given that this person is not particularly famous, it's unlikely we would include them in anything else, so deletion is one thing to consider. Your input is appreciated. SDY (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for delete. I created that article ages ago and I much better understand the notability guidelines now. Thanks for your attention to the matter! Patricia Meadows (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. Thanks for your time. SDY (talk) 00:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Immunology

I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 09:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steely Dan

Why this reversion? CCS81 (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No harm intended. The revision I was intending to undo was this one as I thought adding "as well as rock and pop musics" to the "Musical and lyrical style" did not improve the article. Patricia Meadows (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I only added it to complete the sentence, which states that Steely Dan draws on "various" musical styles but then only cites one: jazz. I don't deny that the paragraph, and indeed whole style section, needs work. Your edit was a rollback and undid other unrelated changes I made, which is why I asked. Best, CCS81 (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Arthur L. Jenkins, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Arthur L. Jenkins" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel M. Labow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel M. Labow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel M. Labow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eric J. Nestler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

minutes103rd.html |title=National Institute on Drug Abuse |publisher= |accessdate=9 June 2014 }}]</ref> as Council Member of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (for which he served as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Patricia Meadows. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Patricia Meadows. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Shaed

Hi Patricia, just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your move of Shaed to SHAED. Page moves need to be done using the method at Help:How to move a page. Moves should not be done by copying and pasting the article text, as the page history does not get transferred when you do this. Additionally, this is a move that is not merely technical but is in fact controversial, and therefore it would need to be discussed first; see Wikipedia:Requested moves#CM for info on how to do that. However, I think it's unlikely that this move would be supported by the community, as it goes against the Manual of Style on trademarks. Even though the band typically writes their name in all caps, Wikipedia typically converts all caps names to titlecase (e.g. Kiss (band) and Time (magazine)).

Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, IagoQnsi (talk) 13:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I jumped the gun on that one. Thank you for the clarification! Patricia Meadows (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]