Template talk:Did you know
There is currently 1 filled queue. Admin assistance in moving preps is requested.
This page is to nominate fresh articles to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page with a "hook" (an interesting note). Nominations that have been approved are moved to a staging area and then promoted into the Queue. To update this page, it.
Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
April 13 | 1 | 1 |
April 19 | 2 | |
April 24 | 1 | 1 |
April 25 | 2 | |
April 26 | 1 | |
April 29 | 1 | |
April 30 | 1 | |
May 2 | 2 | |
May 5 | 1 | |
May 7 | 2 | 1 |
May 8 | 1 | 1 |
May 9 | 2 | |
May 10 | 3 | |
May 12 | 6 | 2 |
May 14 | 2 | |
May 15 | 1 | 1 |
May 16 | 2 | |
May 17 | 6 | 1 |
May 19 | 1 | |
May 20 | 7 | 4 |
May 21 | 9 | 4 |
May 22 | 5 | 2 |
May 23 | 1 | |
May 24 | 5 | 2 |
May 25 | 3 | |
May 26 | 4 | 1 |
May 27 | 6 | 2 |
May 28 | 2 | 1 |
May 29 | 5 | 2 |
May 30 | 4 | 2 |
May 31 | 3 | 3 |
June 1 | 4 | 2 |
June 2 | 4 | 1 |
June 3 | 4 | 2 |
June 4 | 1 | |
June 5 | 8 | 6 |
June 6 | 4 | |
June 7 | 9 | 5 |
June 8 | 10 | 5 |
June 9 | 14 | 5 |
June 10 | 4 | 2 |
June 11 | 7 | 2 |
June 12 | 8 | 2 |
June 13 | 14 | 5 |
June 14 | 8 | 1 |
June 15 | 6 | 3 |
June 16 | 10 | 5 |
June 17 | 9 | 3 |
June 18 | 7 | 2 |
June 19 | 4 | 2 |
June 20 | 4 | |
June 21 | 6 | 1 |
June 22 | 7 | 1 |
June 23 | ||
Total | 244 | 86 |
Last updated 04:18, 23 June 2024 UTC Current time is 05:16, 23 June 2024 UTC [refresh] |
Instructions for nominators
If this is your first nomination, please read the DYK rules before continuing. Further information can be found at the supplementary guidelines.
Frequently asked questions
How do I write an interesting hook?
Successful hooks tend to have several traits. Most importantly, they share a surprising or intriguing fact. They give readers enough context to understand the hook, but leave enough out to make them want to learn more. They are written for a general audience who has no prior knowledge of or interest in the topic area. Lastly, they are concise, and do not attempt to cover multiple facts or present information about the subject beyond what's needed to understand the hook.
When will my nomination be reviewed?
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first, it may take several weeks until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions below).
Where is my hook?
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to this nominations page, it may have been approved and is on the approved nominations page waiting to be promoted. It could also have been added to one of the prep areas, promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
Instructions for reviewers
Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article to which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the supplementary guidelines and the WP:Did you know/Reviewing guide.
To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:
- Look through this page, Template talk:Did you know, to find a nomination you would like to comment on.
- Click the "Review or comment" link at the top of the nomination. You will be taken to the nomination subpage.
- The top of the page includes a list of the DYK criteria. Check the article to ensure it meets all the relevant criteria.
- To indicate the result of the review (i.e., whether the nomination passes, fails, or needs some minor changes), leave a signed comment on the page. Please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following:
If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a lineArticle length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* -->
showing you where you should put the comment. - Save the page.
- After the nomination is approved, a bot will automatically list the nomination page on Template talk:Did you know/Approved.
If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.
Advanced procedures
How to promote an accepted hook
At-a-glance instructions on how to promote an approved hook to a prep area
|
---|
For more information, please see T:TDYK#How to promote an accepted hook. |
Handy copy sources:
To [[T:DYK/P1|Prep 1]]
To [[T:DYK/P2|Prep 2]]
To [[T:DYK/P3|Prep 3]]
To [[T:DYK/P4|Prep 4]]
To [[T:DYK/P5|Prep 5]]
To [[T:DYK/P6|Prep 6]]
To [[T:DYK/P7|Prep 7]]
How to remove a rejected hook
- Open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to remove. (It's best to wait several days after a reviewer has rejected the hook, just in case someone contests or the article undergoes a large change.)
- In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line
{{DYKsubpage
with{{subst:DYKsubpage
, and replace|passed=
with|passed=no
. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a blue archive box and stating that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.
How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue
- Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
- Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
- View the edit history for that page
- Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
- Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
- Add a transclusion of the template back to this page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from this page.
- If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.
How to move a nomination subpage to a new name
- Don't; it should not ever be necessary, and will break some links which will later need to be repaired. Even if you change the title of the article, you don't need to move the nomination page.
Nominations
Older nominations
Articles created/expanded on October 29
Articles created/expanded on November 14
Articles created/expanded on November 27
Articles created/expanded on December 17
Articles created/expanded on December 27
- I can step in for review. I'm not an expert on, well, anything, but I'll do my best. jengod (talk) 01:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Length | Newness | Cited hook | Interest | Sources | Neutrality | Plagiarism/paraphrase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
QPQ done. Approved for any of alts 4 5 and 6 with a recommendation of ALT4. Thank you for sharing your expertise and research with us!
jengod (talk) 01:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @RAJIVVASUDEV: I want to promote this but I keep getting stuck on citations missing from the end of paragraph 1 (yes, citations are optional in the lead paragraph, but only if it is clearly summarising facts that are cited in the main article body; in this case, I cannot easily find a citation for the year 1579, so it would be good to have a footnote); "Origin" paragraph 1; Erddig sentence 1. I assume in the latter two instances, the footnote was left out because it would have been "repetitive" but if so, I would strongly recommend repeating the footnote anyway, because this is Wikipedia, other editors will edit and rearrange content, and things will get mixed up quickly, and it just looks like uncited content. Cielquiparle (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on December 31
Articles created/expanded on January 1
Articles created/expanded on January 2
Articles created/expanded on January 4
Articles created/expanded on January 5
Articles created/expanded on January 7
Articles created/expanded on January 9
Articles created/expanded on January 11
Articles created/expanded on January 12
Articles created/expanded on January 14
Articles created/expanded on January 15
Articles created/expanded on January 16
Articles created/expanded on January 17
Articles created/expanded on January 20
Articles created/expanded on January 22
Articles created/expanded on January 23
Articles created/expanded on January 24
Articles created/expanded on January 25
Articles created/expanded on January 26
I'll take a look. jengod (talk) 05:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Length | Newness | Cited hook | Interest | Sources | Neutrality | Plagiarism/paraphrase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Long enough, good articled recently enough, hook is interested and source-verified, NPOV, and earwig is happy. I did a spot check of three sources and didn't see any other instances of close paraphrasing. Good to go. jengod (talk) 05:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 27
Articles created/expanded on January 28
Articles created/expanded on January 29
Articles created/expanded on January 30
Articles created/expanded on January 31
Articles created/expanded on February 1
Articles created/expanded on February 2
Articles created/expanded on February 3
Articles created/expanded on February 4
Articles created/expanded on February 5
with ALT2. Thank you, Cielquiparle. Sorry I don't think that we can use ALT1a, because the final phrase in the hook contains awkward syntax (as if the imams were contemporaries and he died first?), and I fear that it could be thrown out of prep (or at least corrected in prep) on those grounds. I have corrected ALT2 (is→was) Storye book (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC).
Articles created/expanded on February 6
Template:Did you know nominations/Kevin Noble Maillard
Articles created/expanded on February 7
Articles created/expanded on February 8
Articles created/expanded on February 9
Articles created/expanded on February 10
Articles created/expanded on February 11
Current nominations
Articles created/expanded on February 12
Articles created/expanded on February 13
Articles created/expanded on February 14
Articles created/expanded on February 15
Articles created/expanded on February 16
Articles created/expanded on February 17
Articles created/expanded on February 18
Articles created/expanded on February 19
Special occasion holding area
The holding area is near the top of the Approved page. Please only place approved templates there; do not place them below.
- Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section above, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began; indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
- Note: Articles intended to be held for special occasion dates should be nominated within seven days of creation, start of expansion, or promotion to Good Article status. The nomination should be made at least one week prior to the occasion date, to allow time for reviews and promotions through the prep and queue sets, but not more than six weeks in advance. The proposed occasion must be deemed sufficiently special by reviewers. The timeline limitations, including the six week maximum, may be waived by consensus, if a request is made at WT:DYK, but requests are not always successful. Discussion clarifying the hold criteria can be found here: [1]; discussion setting the six week limit can be found here: [2].
- April Fools' Day hooks are exempted from the timeline limit; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.
I bet nhehp
Tomb 2600:1700:ABD0:5CB0:5D86:494:53C1:6CD7 (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)