Jump to content

User talk:SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk | contribs) at 01:04, 28 February 2023 (→February 2023). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, GDFilbert03, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sarrail (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey; no worries, our computers often die whenever we edit too much on Wikipedia, consuming our batteries... Sarrail (talk) 01:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Nesat (2022) has been accepted

Typhoon Nesat (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GDFilbert03. Thank you for your work on Tropical Storm Nalgae (2022). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Typhoon Lan (disambiguation)

Hello GDFilbert03,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Typhoon Lan (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 22:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2013 Pacific hurricane season into Draft:Tropical Storm Ivo (2013). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Bopha (2006) (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:2006 Pacific typhoon season. Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GDFilbert03! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Haima (2011) (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has sections that are missing, and may be resubmitted when the sections are filled in.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Tropical Storm Yamaneko (2022)

Draft:Tropical Storm Yamaneko (2022), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tropical Storm Yamaneko (2022) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Tropical Storm Yamaneko (2022) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drdpw (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1988 Pacific hurricane season into Draft:Hurricane Kristy (1988). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concert

'Kay, good luck on the concert! (I do, also play the viola as well, currently playin' a Pirates of the Caribbean verse. Sarrail (talk) 14:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dropped my viola and the bridge got loose :( I really hope I put it in the right spot because I tuned my stings to the position I put it in. No other signs of damage. SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 14:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Playing First Christmas March, a march with multiple Christmas songs combined in it, Up on the Housetop, and North Pole March, which is a original piece. SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You got lucky. One of the other people playing a violin completely broke, the neck snapped off. Nightmare. Sarrail (talk) 14:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. That sounds horrible. SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I have to do a presentation today, the same day as the concert because we ran out of time in class yesterday. SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 15:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just got done with the presentation: I hope that I got a good grade. SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 15:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Wilda (1964) has been accepted

Typhoon Wilda (1964), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tails Wx 14:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring. Thank you for your work on Typhoon Wilda (1964). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Pabuk (2001) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sorry, but this needs more expansion and sources, it looks like most of the content is in 2001 Pacific typhoon season#Typhoon Pabuk. Most of the story can be told in that section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tails Wx 17:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have upgraded the article to have more citations. I've expanded it, so if you don't mind, you can re-review it. Sahapamowe (talk!) 22:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m a little busy IRL, I’ll take the time to review it soon. Otherwise, another AFC reviewer might come across and review it. Tails Wx 22:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. Sahapamowe (talk!) SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring 22:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve accepted the draft. Tails Wx 17:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave a link to the source article when copying content from other pages, such as in copies like this one; mentioning the article title is usually insufficient. The link is part of the requirements for proper attribution. Thank you! Chlod (say hi!) 03:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Usagi (2007) (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:
Needs more expansion, especially the "Preparations and impact" section. Once it is expanded, it may potentially be accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tails Wx 14:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

I have recently uploaded this image while on vacation. Sahapamowe (talk!) 04:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

AfC notification: Draft:Typhoon Opal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Typhoon Opal. Thanks! Tails Wx 18:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Opal (1964) has been accepted

Typhoon Opal (1964), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Silikonz💬 00:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1964 Pacific typhoon season into Draft:Typhoon Opal. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Tropical Storm Nalgae, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Why did you put an extra "e" on the Tropical Storm Nalgae? Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 16:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that was me... I was at school! Maybe I need to change my password...

Sahapamowe (talk!) 01:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring&oldid=1142006234"