Jump to content

User talk:Roxy the dog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bishzilla (talk | contribs) at 07:25, 5 May 2023 (→‎In hospital: typical dino joke). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


76 edits National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy
69 edits Jenner Medal of the Royal Society of Medicine
60 edits Comstock Act of 1873
40 edits Mifepristone
34 edits Abortion law in the United States by state
32 edits Residency (medicine)
31 edits Epigenetics of human herpesvirus latency
29 edits List of pharmaceutical companies
29 edits Elafibranor
26 edits COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia

These are the articles that have been edited the most within the last seven days. Last updated 14 June 2024 by HotArticlesBot.

March 2023

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lia Thomas. Hi Roxy the dog, the poorly-sourced controversial information is disputed on WP:BLP grounds, not just Fox News, and I am sorry you continue to try to add it. I have removed it again per WP:BLPRESTORE. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are a worthless piece of shite liar, who is officially banned from this page. I hope you choke on your lies. -Roxy the dog 13:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Lia Thomas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Courcelles (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This block is also justified based on that lovely personal attack above. Please don't do things like that. Courcelles (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Roxy the dog, keep a cool head and remember that you can't win 100% of the disputes, even if you're right 100% of the time. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Roxy the dog, you are a long-term editor here, and you know that the comment above is a personal attack against Beccaynr, and that's on top of the edit warring you did at Lia Thomas. Take a breather and understand you can't win all disputes and that this behavior is not helping your cause in any way, shape, or form. If this type of editing continues, I know you will receive further severe sanctions. Frankly, I'm surprised only this slap on the wrist was given. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 15:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen too many decent editors get kicked off Wikipedia because they couldn't keep their temper or avoid edit-warring. I'd like to think you'll still be around when I'm gone (involuntarily I mean), but that won't happen if you don't change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 16:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Roxy, I agree with the block, the page ban, and with all of the comments to you above. That personal attack and edit warring are indefensible. I've warned you about this stuff in the past, but you clearly did not listen to me. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yow, Roxy. I totally get it that you're incredibly frustrated, but honestly you're lucky Courcelles showed up here before I did. I'd have indef'd for the absolutely egregious personal attack. Valereee (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

"we are biased towards CCM, and biased against TCM" Troopersho (talk) 04:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are biased towards design thinking, and biased against intelligent design Troopersho (talk) 04:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Lentil rice

Hello. Is there a specific reason for removing a part of the Lentil rice article? Serving this specific food for Nazr in Iran is quite traditional and well-documented. Please check it out. Arbabi second (talk) 13:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

then you need to source what you want to say based on WP:RS reliable sources. The current sources are rather weak and dont really stand up to our requirements. - Roxy the dog 13:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this [1] proof is enough or not? Arbabi second (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I dont know Farsi, so I cannot help. - Roxy the dog 13:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But you could delete, whereas it would be better if this was left to someone who knows Persian. After all, it was not so dangerous that it had to be deleted absolutely right away. Arbabi second (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

b4?

Hi! In your reversion of an edit I made you wrote "As b4. your heirarchy arguement makes no sense. defining characteristic". I was wondering what you mean by b4.? If this is short for "before," could you explain why my argument doesn't make any sense, i.e. what the flaw in my logic is? And what do you mean by "defining characteristic"? —Kri (talk) 09:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for not replying, not too well at the moment. Will respond when I have a keyboard Roxy the dog 13:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In hospital

Hope you're doing as well as possible, Roxy. Bishonen | tålk 18:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Oh, my goodness, from me too. I'm glad you say that it's not life-threatening. But please know that you are in my thoughts. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really messed up my user page, and I’m very unhappy with this page following my recent stupidity. People provide me with good examples of how to behave, and I’ve fallen short again. When I get to a keyboard I’ll fill in some detail, but ironically in the hopefully not too distant future, I’ll be having some abdominal surgery, rather like another of my examples to follow, but much less serious.Roxy the dog 12:48, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about any of that. As I say all too frequently, this is only a website. What matters is getting back to good health. All the best wishes for your upcoming surgery. There will be plenty of time after that for editors to cut you another a-hole (that was a very bad joke). --Tryptofish (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I like bad jokes. Roxy the dog 21:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Poor little user be having abominable surgery! bishzilla ROARR!! pocket 07:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Roxy_the_dog&oldid=1153268862"