Jump to content

User talk:AAA!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.214.18.86 (talk) at 18:30, 16 March 2007 (→‎More UPN Vandal stuff is done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page by starting a new thread. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.
Talk page guidelines
Please respect Wikiquette, assume good faith and be nice, and bear in mind what Wikipedia is not.

If you're here to accuse me for reverting a legitimate edit, please realize that users occasionally make mistakes, as Wikipedia is often vandalized, and sometimes we miswarn a user. If you believe I have reverted your edit in error, please calmly leave me a message at the bottom of this page, and I will look into your edit.


Welcome!

Hi, AAA!, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
I go by the nick Werdna here, but you can call me Andrew if you like. Thanks for deciding to get involved in Wikipedia, the largest encyclopedia in the world, created entirely by volunteers, and that anyone can edit. I just thought I'd drop by your talk page to say Hi, and to give you a few pointers on working around Wikipedia. One of the most important things is to sign your posts on talk pages, with four tildes (~~~~). This helps us figure out who said what and when on the talk pages. Another thing you should do is to fill in the edit summary field, which is just above the Save page button. You should also make all of your contributions here verifiable by a reliable source, or they might be reverted or removed. Finally, don't let grumpy people here scare you off. We have a policy of not biting the newbies — please make an effort to know and understand our policies and guidelines, but if you don't understand them, just ignore them, and use your own common sense. There's stacks for you to do here, so I'll leave you with a few pointers as to where you can get started. — Werdna talk criticism 06:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Thanks!

Hi AAA! Thanks for helping me keep the Monash Student Association wiki page clean. Can you also have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne University Labor Club and add your opinion? I'm getting sick of Australian student politicians using Wikipedia to promote their own agendas.--Petrol pyro 10:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Innapropriate username?

Innapropriate username? --60.241.167.210 06:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AA, AAA AAA AA AAA AAAAAAAA! AAA AAAAAAAA A AAA! --AAAAAAAAAAA 44:44, 44 AAAAAAAA 4444 (AAA)
What he said. --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 06:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't resist :) --WikiSlasher 06:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, AAA!! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what do you need help with? Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Futurama

We all miss Futurama. --Yancyfry jr 02:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't we all... --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 03:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Deregulation of the Texas Electricity Market"

Those edits were NOT "test edits": That articel was in an abysmal state, flooded with bias and unencyclopedic wording, over 1/3d of which was a blatant copyright violation (See the initial edit summary). 68.39.174.238 03:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was a massive redaction, so I wasn't too surprized when it got auto-reverted ;D. 68.39.174.238 03:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Buckley

What I wrote in the article about Robert Buckley is true. You can revert it if you insist, but it's true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.76.181 (talk • contribs)

Due Process

Hi, I noticed that you reverted 15 edits that I did, and I was wondering why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.243.72 (talk • contribs)

Spurious vandalism accusation

I am astonished at your revert of my edit and the subsequent spurious accusation of vandalism for which I'm expecting an apology. I suppose you should know that it is inappropriate to make edits into archived peer reviews of featured article candidates because such edits can skew the impression from the discussion. Beit Or 07:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your recognition of a mistake. Unwarranted late insertions into archived discussions are reverted all the time. Please don't revert me again. Beit Or 08:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. I haven't configured my VandalProof settings, but I have done it now, so you should be okay. --AAA! (AAAA) 11:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ilaiyaraaja

Hi AAA!. Noticed that you made an edit in the above Wiki's discussion page. May I know what the edit pertains to and the rationale for the edit? Thanks. RaraTheAppleJuggler 08:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiMapia

but it's true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.100.11 (talk • contribs)

Oh, I haven't read the big yellow box above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.100.11 (talk • contribs)

Thank You

Hi AAA

Thank u for ur correction on my page Sasha Abunnadi. I find that very insulting, frustrating and downright disrespectful. I also find it very ignorant, considering some people just don't understand that Middle eastern is very different from Afghani, Pakistani, or even Iranian. Thank you again for catching that.

MBCC

Articles for Deletion: Holophonor and Planet Express Ship

As pointed out by Stardust8212, both the Planet Express Ship and Holophonor articles are currently marked for deletion. Your comments thereon would be really appreciated. DrWho42 06:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zen

I don't think those Zen edits you reverted were a test. --MichaelMaggs 10:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

I seem to have forgotten to do so, thanks for reminding me.--TBCΦtalk? 16:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Why do you want do delete my image? Miller 10:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well that’s why I kept it hidden on my copyright complaint archives page! What harm is doing there? I funny image hidden away on an archives page is hardly a “personal attack” now is it?Miller 16:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You may hath won the battle, you damned Wikipedian, but you hath not won the war. My image shall be taken to the much more respectable online encyclopedia [1]. Luckily “Personal attacks” are allowed in this place: [2]! Wah hah hah hah! Long live Uncyclopedia! Miller 23:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a brilliant gag, but here it is on Uncyclopedia: [3] 20:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Template db-meta

Do we really need a stop hand on Template:db-meta? It is in my opinion distracting and throws off the formatting of the text. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 22:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalSniper userbox

Thanks for making that and putting it on my user page! It's pretty much exactly what I was looking for in a VS userbox, and it's simple and strong to boot. Good work! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome

You're quite welcome. Sharkface217 04:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of your own user pages

I closed the nomination and deleted the page. In future, just add {{db-userreq}} to the user page of yours you want deleted. No fuss, no MfD needed. Regards, Kimchi.sg 05:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The whole list of them is here : Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Deletion templates I agree they multiply faster than rabbits, but you'll use only a few most of the time. ;-) Kimchi.sg 06:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your signature

Per WP:SIG#Transclusion/template, transclusion of user subpages is not allowed in signatures. Please remove, thank you. —Doug Bell talk 23:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 02:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AAAAAAAAAAAA!

Aa, a aaa aaaaa aa aaaa:

AAAAA A AAA AAAAA AAA A AA AAA. AAA, AAAA AA AAA AAAA. AAAAAAAAA!




AAAAAA, AAAAAAAAAAA

Did you steal those userpage templates translated into AAAAAAAAA! from my page?

I have no problem with that, just curious. Sir Crazyswordsman 07:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I substituted Template:Userpage and replaced everything with A's. Probably a coincidence. --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 09:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long term abuse pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Hi AAA!, I'm guessing you weren't around when Wikipedia:Deny recognition was adopted and Wikipedia:Long term abuse was last cleaned up. Read through all the reports that you are sending to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion very carefully. There's a huge difference between denying recognition and tracking abusive users who have been permanently banned or use very subtle tactics to POV push, spam, or vandalise articles. For example, could you spot Universe Daily yourself without a reference page to refer to? I doubt it. Please don't waste everyone's time with a blind mass nomination -- they're disruptive. --  Netsnipe  ►  11:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So much for doing the right thing. Okay, revert my edits. I still haven't got this "policy" thing figured out yet... --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 11:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No need to worry about it. We've all made mistakes, I've even made a few here at some point! Don't worry about it! --SunStar Nettalk 12:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your intentions were right and some of the pages you nominated deserve to be deleted, but you went a bit overboard in nominating all of them without reviewing their content first. --  Netsnipe  ►  13:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time for my meds! (really) --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 23:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OvergrownSpaHellBourg.jpg

Thanks for that. However, I still cannot edit it. For example, there is a minor error in the image description, and I can't fix it. Any ideas about how this came about and how it can be changed? MadMaxDog 05:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try logging out and editing the image as an IP. That might work. --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 05:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UPN vandal

I might watch some of the targeted pages. Can you give me a list? --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 03:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three of the vandal's main targets were UPN and 2007 in television (which I semi-protected) and Futurama (which another sysop semi-protected). Also vandalized to varying extents were Butters' Very Own Episode, CBS Paramount Television, Chappelle's Show, Comcast, Comedy Central, Desire (TV series) KUVI-TV, Moesha, Paramount Television, Password, Romeo!, Tweek, Watch Over Me and WPWR-TV. This might not be a complete list. —David Levy 04:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Can't we just block all these IPs (For at least 1 year)? Also, I've discovered some of the socks are proxies. --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 03:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you tell me which IP addresses are open proxies (and provide proof of this), I'll block them indefinitely.
As for the others, long-term blocks would mainly affect innocent users. —David Levy 04:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, these are the proxies. Type in their IP address at this site, and look at the box "Is proxy":'
*contributions
*contributions
*contributions
*contributions
*contributions --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 05:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Those appear to be AOL proxies, which are used by AOL to provide Internet connectivity to subscribers. They are not the same as open proxies (which are disallowed by Wikipedia policy). —David Levy 06:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:4.68.248.134

His/her block has expired, and is still doing that UPN vandalism. I've given him/her an only warning. Next time he/she makes another false move, please block him/her. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm already on it. I've blocked the IP address for a month. —David Levy 05:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:Russia is the best

Hm... at this point, it would probably only indicate that we're still paying attention to it. But I'll keep that in mind, if I run into it again. Thanks. Luna Santin 00:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thx

  S
SSSSS
 SSS
S   S

I give AAA! this text star simply for finishing the work I was doing for the BJAODN page. Dark Ermac 15:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Zoidberg) "Hooray! I'm useful!" --AAA! (AAAA) 06:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

Please configure your account to accept e-mail from other users or e-mail me directly. —David Levy 13:45/14:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I don't have an email. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You might consider registering a free e-mail account somewhere (such as Yahoo! Mail). I wish to inform you of something without invoking WP:BEANS. —David Levy 05:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VandalSniper

You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UPN vandal update

He now has members:

I've blocked both accounts indefinitely. —David Levy 22:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More socks

I have also updated his entry at RFI, but I think this vandal qualifies for Long Term Abuse.
And please look at this. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked all of the accounts indefinitely and speedily deleted/protected the reposted nonsense page. —David Levy 11:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but could you also delete User:Delariondavis3? Before I redirected it to his talk page the only content was an imitation of my own page. --AAA! (AAAA) 11:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. —David Levy 11:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected List of Interscope Records artists; thanks for the suggestion. (I also fixed the heading level of the section below; hope you don't mind. :) ) —tregoweth (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Indeed, I think that you should become an admin (and I'd like to nominate you myself). Here's my advice:
1. Wait a few months before applying. Otherwise, some people will oppose your nomination on the basis that your account is too new.
2. Tone down your user page's Uncyclopediocity (thereby making it easier for readers to understand who you are and how to contact you for help). Stuff like the Willy on Wheels joke needs to go, and you probably should at least move the userboxes to a separate page.
3. Get an e-mail address. Every sysop should have one, as it's important that users be able to communicate with you off-wiki. If you have access to any sort of private messaging (via an IM program or website) I'd be glad to send you a Gmail invite.
I still have other information that I'd like to share, but I would prefer to do so via e-mail. —David Levy 00:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Also, I'm going away on holiday for 3 days, so you'll have to take care of the vandal by yourself. Sorry about that. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*cough* beans *cough*
Anyway, I'll try my best. Enjoy your holiday!  :-) —David Levy 01:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

A Barnstar!
The coveted Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks very much for the barnstar! It occurs to me that you deserve one too, so here you go!  :-) —David Levy 12:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on IPVandal

Could you explain http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:IPvandal&curid=5048777&diff=100622658&oldid=100339322 ?

Is it that you have misstaken | with &124;? →AzaToth 16:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. You replaced the bullets with the straight lines, as you may know. But sometimes people might want to link them, such as [[WP:RFI#127.0.0.1 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log)|link]] which you have to use the | to shorten link. But if you used the | instead of the bullets, it will confuse the server and make the link look like contribs | WHOIS | RDNS | RBLs | block user | block log)|link. Now, the bullets don't do that, because they aren't used in the MediaWiki software during linking; so it should come up as link. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then I understand, the reason for my edit, was that I though it would be good if they all looked simlar to the {{lx}} family templates. →AzaToth 01:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goatse

Thank you for fixing the image. My nipples explode with delight!!! Floaterfluss (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oookay, then... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Long term abuse

I think the UPN vandal now qualifies for Long Term Abuse. Should we submit an entry? --AAA! (AAAA) 03:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that I would prefer to discuss via e-mail. Please create an e-mail account somewhere. If you'd like, I'll even post some Gmail signup links on your talk page. —David Levy 03:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'm going to try and get a hotmail account. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! When you do, please add it to your Wikipedia preferences, confirm it, and make sure that the "Enable e-mail from other users" box is ticked. Then I'll be able to e-mail you. —David Levy 03:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Why are you rollbacking me? Several editors have already agreed to tag it and improve it. Stop stifling the improvements, and lay off the page if you're involved in it (which, judging by your name, you are). After all the discussion so far, you need to use edit summaries and teh talk page like everyone else. Milto LOL pia 03:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just doing what the admins are telling me. And I do use edit summaries. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I mean one that explains your edit, not just "reverted this vandal guy". And I don't see any admins telling you to revert. Did I misunderstand? Milto LOL pia 03:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I try to keep order around here. Whatever an admin says, I obey it. And what you are doing can be considered trolling, which can get you blocked from here. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, what I am doing can be considered "trying to get cites for an article so it can be front-paged". And what admins are telling you to revert me? I don't see anything on your talk page. Milto LOL pia 03:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

of possible interest

Some products and services you might find of interest are this, this, and this. As you probably know, Wikipedia has articles on A, Aa, Aaa, and Aaaa, but as yet no article Aaaaa or Aaaaa..., thus there is nowhere to put information on articles such as this, which is a shame, I think. Herostratus 05:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not interested. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I think that's cool idea! Dark Ermac 12:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CONCERNING THE PALMS SHOPPING MALL ARTICLE

I have since updated the article and the article I beleive is well documented. Especially if compared to a alot of the other articles around. The Article has two relevant links and the only thing that might cause any concerns is the picture(which i clearly stated was posted on a photohosting website by one of my mates and has no copyright requirements whatsoever. I will continue tio update the article as i think it is a relevant article and especially when you take into account that i am a new user and this is my first piece excuses any mistakes. I do not understand why it should have to be deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tbite (talk (Tbite 14:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)). [reply]

Neuro

no problem at all, but which color do you prefer, 3 or 4. i personally like 3.... thuglastalk|edits 23:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I like the red barnstar with #4 sparks. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do them both up. I need a few days. exam tomorrow. ill let you know when done. thuglastalk|edits 23:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who am i kidding, i'm addicted to wiki. I did it. Its hard just to do it normally because there has to be some contrast between the background and the dendrites. I did my best to compromise... check it out... thuglastalk|edits 23:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You ain't the only one who's addicted... :P --AAA! (AAAA) 23:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Neuronew5.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Neuronew5.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

You know the drill...

contributions. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've already blocked that account (along with contributions, contributions and contributions), deleted a couple of pages that the user created, and removed links to said pages. —David Levy 06:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have mail. —David Levy 06:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UPN vandal

User:DelarionDavis19 has been blocked. —tregoweth (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ludavion 4

...has been blocked. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 06:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protected. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 06:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brendavis 18

Blocked. —tregoweth (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Much obliged, sir. —tregoweth (talk) 03:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editorship

From what I've seen, you'd probably make a fine editor. I was recommended for editorship based on my continuing battles against MascotGuy; I'll look into the procedures for nominating and whatnot. :) —tregoweth (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zoidy-Poo

I have adopted a member, named Zoidy-Poo, who is a friend of mine outside Wikipedia. But I can't do this alone. Could you co-adopt him to help me? Thanks. --AAA! (AAAA) 11:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to assist either of you to the best of my abilities. Just let me know if you need help.  :-) —David Levy 20:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Not a star" barnstar

Thanks. and AAAAAAAAAAAAAA! back to ya :-) — Rickyrab | Talk 07:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is like, what, the 4th person who's commented on my name? :P --AAA! (AAAA) 02:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Buddhist Monkey.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Buddhist Monkey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian

I dont know the qualifications for a vandal, but i may have foundone. Maybe you could look into this? thuglastalk|edits 01:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by his contributions, he doesn't look like a vandal. He's probably a new user who wants to expand articles (I do, sometimes), which isn't vandalism. And to know the qualifications of a vandal, go into their contributions and look at some of the diffs. If any seem to be nonsense, POV, or personal attacks, or clear vandalism, then that person may be a vandal, and should be warned with the appropriate warning templates. If he continues to vandalise despite a last warning, then you can report him to WP:AIV. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had looked at several articles he has edited. Almost all of the edits i looked at appeared to be nonsense, but perhaps i did not look at enough of them or did not have knowledge of the material myself... One of them talked about erections? - [[4]] the one that made me suspicious was an unsourced claim that had no hits on google... Regardless, thanks for looking into it for me thuglastalk|edits 12:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure these are not vandalism -

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Reynolds_%28actor%29&diff=prev&oldid=86441550

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Harvey_Birdman%2C_Attorney_at_Law_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=103426932 thuglastalk|edits 00:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism. Just because someone added a reference to erections doesn't mean it's vandalism (unless it was in a silly way like "His erections are bigger than a tree trunk", then that's vandalism). I remember seeing a few T.V. shows that have made a few penis jokes myself, they can still be added to articles, as long as it's not in a silly way. Also, could you show me those nonsense edits you were talking about? --AAA! (AAAA) 00:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You did not respond to his first contribution. John Reynolds 'allegedly' plays a role on a lark? where is this coming from? is this implying he rides a lark while acting or something i have not thought of? the revert i made on carol king seemed nonsensical to me so i reverted it because it had no hits on google. Most or all of his edits seem odd and have no sources. While i do not argue that adding to wikipedia requires sources - if someone is making many claims that cannot be verified i would suggest having some way of checking. After all i could say B.F. Skinner 'allegedly' was a underdeveloped child when he was younger but this should need some form of source. after all, perhaps i have alleged this? I have not found one edit he has made that i have been able to verify. i appologise for poor grammar and such i have no time to be wiki'ing - exam in 12 hours. thuglastalk|edits 02:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I'm afraid I can't help you there. Try contacting an admin. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AA (AAAAA)

AAA AAA! (AAAAA). AA... AAAAAA? AAA AA AAAAAA AA AAAAAAA? AAAA-- aGH, URGH, AHEM ugh... okay, I'm beter now.

so... whatsup? Just decided to say hi (again). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dark Ermac (talk • contribs) 14:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Nothing much. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock again

contributions --AAA! (AAAA) 02:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. Images deleted. —David Levy 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contributions - I can tell because he uploaded fake UPN images. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. Images deleted. —David Levy 11:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contributions --AAA! (AAAA) 21:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. Edits rolled back. —David Levy 21:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And I think UPN will need semi-protection again. --AAA! (AAAA) 21:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. —David Levy 21:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contributions. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. Image deleted. —David Levy 05:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, 4.68.248.134's block has now expired. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye on the contributions. —David Levy 05:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contributions --AAA! (AAAA) 00:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. —David Levy 02:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contributions --AAA! (AAAA) 05:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. Article and image deleted. —David Levy 06:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I also came across this one. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked indefinitely. —David Levy 16:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sooooo...

Uhh... What happened to all the Barnstar Proposals? Are they dead or something? Dark Ermac 14:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know; I'm not the one armed with explosives... :P --AAA! (AAAA) 23:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help....

GAH!!! Stupid me! *Face-palm* My squidditch picture was badly photoshopped by me, and I got the pics from Google Images. Zoidy-Poo 10:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:The UPN Vandal

User:The UPN Vandal has been blocked (I think that name violates username rules anyway, as it promotes a company :) ).

Finally, I won't have to look up that one IP address all the time when I tag sockpuppets! —tregoweth (talk) 00:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand what this tagging accomplishes (aside from providing recognition) —David Levy 01:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year

Thank you for voting in the picture of the year. However your vote was invalid because you did not have 100 edits on Commons, or the diff you supplied was not correct. Please read the instructions on diff making how to do this. You can remove the strike from your vote once you have add a correct diff. Thanks, Bryan 19:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assert to be the same user as Commons:User:AAA!. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As per your request, please find enclosed...

Image:WP_for_Futurama_Userbox_purple_background.png (your requested image). I prefer the transparent myself, so I have uploaded a new file, not overwrote the existing one. If you have comments/questions/concerns feel free to contact me. --WillMak050389 05:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shock Site article

You reverted my removal of Lemon Party. In my edit summary, I refered to [[5]]. Yes, Lemon Party is a notable website, but the removed content was nothing that was suitable for a tertiary source like Wikipedia. It was pure description, taken from personal observation, and a comment on how it was "offline for a few years".

Unless some site publishes an article that specifically mentions lemonparty and its usage/distribution and/or fame on the web, nothing that can be said about lemonparty is objectively notable. Blueaster 01:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{sockpuppet}}

Excellent! Thanks for the note. —tregoweth (talk) 12:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

signature

UPN Vandal

70.237.122.93 and 172.164.138.4 are now blocked. —tregoweth (talk) 04:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I protected it for another six months; I figure there should be an actual soundtrack album out by then. :) —tregoweth (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Your user page...

What exactly do you mean by "Blue Key" and "Red Key" on your talk page?


Thanks,

Booksworm Talk to me! 20:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My way of saying "I'm not telling". =P --AAA! (AAAA) 22:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little task for you

[Copied from User talk:David Levy]

Another UPN sock, contributions, has created a few pages which I've marked for Speedy deletion. These were created on the 6th of March. Hoping if you could delete them. Thanks. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you transfer the salted page "Greene County Cable Television" to "Wikipedia:Protected titles" (aswell as its talk page)? --AAA! (AAAA) 05:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done and done.  :-) —David Levy 06:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admin coaching

Sure. Though, frankly, you've been doing pretty well so far. :) —тяеɢощетн (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lyme

That's good. It's now down to 79 KB. I'd recommend adding a bit more of that controversy stuff back in the main article (maybe one or two more paragraphs) and also split off a few other of the longer sections of the article. Everyking 09:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. It looks like that's actually the last long section left, so maybe the article will be OK if you take some length off there. Everyking 09:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I struck out my object vote. Is it good enough to be an FA? Right now I'd say no; I don't think the referencing is good enough. Some parts of the article are strong on references, but some parts are very weak. But it can always be improved during the nom. Everyking 10:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD you might be interested in...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A

One of your relatives? Came very close to deletion... --W.marsh 13:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, too late. Oh well. At least he was saved... --AAA! (AAAA) 13:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AAA!&oldid=115610220"