Jump to content

Talk:Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 147.10.241.239 (talk) at 07:40, 28 May 2023 (→‎Article in Sydney Morning Herald: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconAustralia: Television B‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconAustralian Broadcasting Corporation is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Top-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconMedia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:


Article in Sydney Morning Herald

This weekend's Sydney Morning Herald carried an article by Legal Affairs Reporter Michaela Whitburn, under the title 'Not high quality journalism: court scolds ABC'. In the article, Whitburn refers to a judgment by the Full Court of the Federal Cout, on an appeal on a defamation action by Peter V'landys. Although the defamation case was unsuccessful, the Court indicated that the ABC and its journalist had treated V'landys "very shabbily", and that the reporting "was not fair or decent treatment of (V'landys). .... It is understandable that V'landys was upset at the report". I think it is significant that this has been reported on by the SMH and it is appropriate that a reference to this be include in the controvery section of this Wikipedia article. What do other Editors think? 147.10.241.239 (talk) 07:40, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]