Jump to content

Talk:Urine therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ebricca (talk | contribs) at 05:00, 12 August 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



PortaJohn's e-commerce website is not a reliable source

Leave it out or justify it's inclusion.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better sourcing needed

I have removed the last paragraph of the history section and pulled it to here. YouTube shouldn't be the only source and I can't find anything in English about this. Anyone have a better source that I'm missing?

In July 2018, fake news propagating the benefits of overpriced cow's urine (go mutra) turned viral in India after spreading over facebook and whatsapp and getting liked by a few million people. The video falsely presented betadine as a poison and cow's urine as a "cleanser" that removed its brown colouration.[1][better source needed] Subsequently, these claims were found to be untrue and a pretense to sell overpriced cow urine from laboratories.[citation needed]

Rap Chart Mike (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Rathee, Dhruv. "Cow urine magic - the truth behind the recent gomutra videos". You tube. {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)

Whitening of teeth in Ancient Rome.

The Urine article states that "Urine was also used for whitening teeth in Ancient Rome" and links to this article with the internal link #Rome. If there was ever mention of this in Urine Therapy, it has now gone. 92.3.210.86 (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2019

Please mention that urine therapy is in NO way safe or is actually proven to do anything. It's been documented that its rather harmful. 122.151.223.169 (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It's not clear what change(s) you want to make. Please make a precise request and provide reliable sources to back up any claims. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is false.
See New York State Journal of Medicine 1980-06: Vol 80 Iss 7
https://archive.org/details/sim_new-york-state-journal-of-medicine_1980-06_80_7/page/1149/mode/1up 24.9.67.157 (talk) 22:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pretty interesting npov

it feels like one of the interesting articles where much of the real discussion is hidden in the archives .. the intro phrase "No scientific evidence exists to support any beneficial health claims of urine therapy." seems just plain wrong - written by ideology and pecuniary greed. later down it becomes even more interesting as "untreated" seems the keyword - someone like a ****** company has to extract urea for it to become really beneficial .. jokes aside i tried if for myself today as I had doubts as well - soaked my hand in fresh one for 10 minutes after having strong blue blemishes and my hand significantly improved .. I know that is non scientific - primary source material is never allowed .. the pharisees may rejoice .. Ebricca (talk) 05:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]