Jump to content

Talk:Xesko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 4 September 2023 (Removing conflicting class parameter from talk page of redirect (Task 21)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Untitled

This is not a Autobiography, but a Biography. The only reason I have edit this page a lot of times is because this is the first time I do this and I have experienced a lot on this page.

Tanks for the notice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xesko (talkcontribs)

According to your userpage (which you just changed), this is you. Please let someone else edit it. See WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI. --Evb-wiki (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because of the name Xesko? It's Francisco's Acronym, or it's because I first published the page in my users page? That was because of my inexperience.

Same birthday. Same occupation. From the same place. etc. --Evb-wiki (talk) 03:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be stupid ok. I have done many experiences in my page with different data, and yes I know the other Xesko it is 7 years older than me, we are friends do you see some problem in that? It was my first time please give me a break.

And yes, we are born in the same city and in same country, and yes we have the same tastes and yes I would like being like him but I am not, and yes we have very much in common it is therefore that we are friends.

If you are friends, please see Wikipedia's guidelines regarding conflicts of interest. Please also see WP:CIVIL. --Evb-wiki (talk) 04:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you are a stupid American (I do not say that to be offensive) but only who lives in supposedly democratic but in fact a corrupt and anti-democratic country believes in fact that a person cannot be a neutral and reliably source, because of being a friend of someone. Please see the references and decides if I was not exempt. And by the way, anyone who likes an author, musician, poet or painter, it is never a 100 % it exempts in his appreciation. I contented myself with reporting facts and did not do valuable analysis give the article to be as exempt as possible.

And by the way, it would be ask to much to you, to leave the appreciation of the page for an Angolan or Portuguese , since they are more qualified than you to analyse it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.155.90.36 (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want more?

What the fuck do you want more? that I give up to help create a best wikipedia? If you don't help me and put only this annoying adds I can't improve the articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xesko (talkcontribs)

Notwithstanding the question of whether is is appropriate for you to be editing this page, the article needs better sources. The need for sources goes beyond notability. Information included in an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source.
For example, a reliable source is needed to show that the subject of this article really is also the persons claimed to be his heteronyms. Please also see Wikipedia's manual on style for guidelines on formatting, tone and style conventions. Please, again, see WP:CIVIL and treat other editors with respect. --Evb-wiki (talk) 15:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:BIO and WP:BLP for guidelines specific to biographies and biographies of living person in particular. --Evb-wiki (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]