Talk:Sender (telephony)
Appearance
![]() | Telecommunications Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Requested move 12 October 2023
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– A broad-concept article on the fundamental human concept of Sending has now been created and moved to mainspace. This is immediately the primary topic for the terms Sender, Send, and Sent, so those topics can be moved (particularly "Sender", which was a surprise). BD2412 T 16:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Move Sender to Sender (circuit) or Sender (telephony), no opinion on retargeting other dabs. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support all per nom. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Move Sender to Sender (telephony), not the proposed target. Otherwise, support all the others. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- SEND all of these to disambiguation pages (or telephony) per nom, and yet another feather in the cap of BD2412 Red Slash 18:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sender is an established technical term, but article Sending appears merely a Bullshit article about a common verb. Does sending really need any explanation other than a dictionary entry? kbrose (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)