Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 November 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Malick78 (talk | contribs) at 14:20, 14 November 2023 (Template:Adams Trial: keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar containing only red links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created it to be able to have a decent reference for the actual articles which should be done by this week, I ask for some patience! Tidjani Saleh (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox equivalent of WP:OCASSOC for R v Adams (1957); some members are notable for other reasons. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 15:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep WP:OCASSOC states "The problem with saying that something is "associated" with something else, is that it can be a #SUBJECTIVE and vague determination." Well, the inclusion of witnesses/detectives/the judge/the accused in the Adams Trial template is hardly subjective. If the nominator disagrees with one of the others included, they should use the talk page of the template not throw the baby out with the bathwater. The template has existed for many years uncontroversially. Malick78 (talk) 14:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on one page, seems redundant to other templates like Template:Arab–Israeli diplomacy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused simple table template. If wanted can be subst into Arild Busterud. Gonnym (talk) 10:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of this article, this record and thus the value of the template has been superseded. I have changed the phrasing on the subject's article. This template can be deleted. Additionally, we have created a template to render these records within an article, making these specialized templates unnecessary. Trackinfo (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused hatnote name template created 6 months ago. Gonnym (talk) 10:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxes don't require a separate documentation template that requires additional maintenance (see last two edits). This template was created by a now blocked editor so there is no one working on it or needing it. Gonnym (talk) 10:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sandbox for a module that was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect and unused testing page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused KML file as NE2/Saipan does not exist. Gonnym (talk) 10:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that "NE2" is the creator's username, which would mean this is for Saipan. That said, a template with a text that says west end may be wrong seems isn't fit for an article. Gonnym (talk) 10:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused KML template as R5 Vancouver RapidBus does not exist. Gonnym (talk) 10:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template as R5 RapidBus redirects to R5 Hastings St which uses a different template. Gonnym (talk) 10:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused test that does not seem to be linked to from anywhere anymore. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused KML templates for list of roads. If someone feels they should be added to the articles, feel free and I'll strike the template from the nomination. Gonnym (talk) 09:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Template:Green Day. Gonnym (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a duplication. This is a proposed conversion of the band's singles and other songs into their own template as a means to better organize the various articles for their songs. Many other music artists have templates for songs alone, and there is already a talk section on the template you highlighted to gather more thoughts on this decision. Please add any comments there before deleting this template. PopDisaster182 (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broken sub-template. Testing should be done in Template:FAQ/sandbox or a user sandbox, not like this. Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template has done nothing since 2011. The entire content is contained within noinclude tags. It appears to be safe to delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simple wikitable with no template parameters used in one article. Copy into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed all instances as the infobox (that were used in article sections) just simply duplicated the data from the table in that section. The infobox was not useful to the article. The table displays the results in a more organized way and is better able to expand as the tournament has more editions. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]