Jump to content

User talk:Jtarvin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by TechnoSquirrel69 (talk | contribs) at 23:54, 22 November 2023 (Caution: Not using edit summary for more experienced users (RW 16.1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Anybody Comment!

[edit]

Here ye, hear ye! I say we make march a Brave Series awareness month! A Brave Saga 2 robot called Victorion has been a victim of identity theft. Hasbro stole his name for their fan-built combiner poll and took credit for making the name up. I want fans of transforming robots to know the truth.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Jtarvin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Jtarvin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Jtarvin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 05:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Jtarvin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 04:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint of Braves Baan Gaan (December 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jack Frost was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jack Frost (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Jtarvin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jack Frost (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint of Braves Baan Gaan (December 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 04:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint of Braves Baan Gaan (December 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your additions to the article. We need reliable sources for the information, and this is doubly true for information about living people. If you have a reliable source, please cite it. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 20:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Jtarvin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jtarvin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of superhuman features and abilities in fiction

[edit]

What happened to that article? Jtarvin (talk) 4 July 2019

Adding content requires references

[edit]

In looking back at your contributions, I saw that for a few articles you have added large amounts of content without references. Your own descriptions, even if accurate, are not appropriate unless you provide references. Some of the articles were already tagged for lack of references. David notMD (talk) 01:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brave Saga 2 Victorion

[edit]

You were banned from TFWiki because you kept adding that supposed "theft" in with no proof; even the designer of the toy had no idea what Brave was: https://twitter.com/tfwiki/status/927740835332001792. Do NOT add it again. 107.202.57.20 (talk) 11:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But in the list of female transformers, I only said they share a name by coincidence. Jtarvin (talk). 2:40, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Jtarvin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]