Jump to content

Talk:Scientology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TechBear (talk | contribs) at 04:30, 25 November 2023 (→‎Edit request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former featured article candidateScientology is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseKept
September 25, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article candidate


Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trisandejarnatt (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lunarmoon13 (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction project B&P

In line with the earlier discussions about article size and organization of content across multiple articles, I will be working on a project to push "beliefs and practices" type content to the article Scientology beliefs and practices (one subtopic at a time), and reduce the duplicate content from the Scientology article, with the goal of leaving a summary in Scientology. (Later to determine the scope and composition of Scientology.) Edits will be made in coordination with edits made to Scientology beliefs and practices. (A separate project will be to push & reduce content that should be in Church of Scientology.) ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 06:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2023

Change "Hubbard maintained that 20 percent of the population would be classed as "suppressive persons" because were truly malevolent or dangerous:" to "Hubbard maintained that 20 percent of the population would be classed as "suppressive persons" because they were truly malevolent or dangerous:" Code807 (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cannolis (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2023

Key Scientology beliefs include reincarnation, and that traumatic events cause problematic "engrams" in the mind which can only be removed through an activity called "auditing". A fee is charged for each session of "auditing". Once an "auditor" deems an individual free of "engrams", typically after several years, they are given the status of "clear". CHANGES BEGIN HERE: Change Scholarship differs to Scholars differ on the interpretation of these beliefs: Disneybuff2002 (talk) 23:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. WanderingMorpheme 00:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I did it. looked like a simple issue of which sounds better in a general English sentence.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 02:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you I didn't notice they were asking for a simple typo fix, I saw that it was on Scientology so I thought they were trying to add unsourced information, thank you for looking out and I'll be more careful. WanderingMorpheme 02:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The solution may have been simple, but the deciphering of the request took me a bit. LOL.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 03:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cambial Yellowing: Oy. Please explain further why you think this change was not acceptable. Re "Both written text and authors can do this", note that only authors make written text.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 21:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about "not acceptable": I didn't say that. But the relevant fact here is that sources - i.e. scholarship about the subject from which this article draws its information - differ on the nature of these beliefs. "Scholars differ" suggests or implies an argument or debate (yet to exist explicitly). Scholarship differs indicates the facts: some sources say a. some sources say b. Cambial foliar❧ 21:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

The opening sentence should be edited to read "Scientology is a cult, invented by the American author L. Ron Hubbard, claiming to be a religious movement" (or something similiar). The article must be clear that it is a cult, not simply that some believe it is a cult. Cult analysts strongly believe it is one of the world's most destructive cults. It has done countless harm to many people, ruining their lives. Only people within the cult believe it is legitimate. By stating that "it is variously defined as a cult", you imply it might not be. Wikipedia has indicated other cults are indeed cults in the opening sentences of those other pages - including other cults that are less destructive than Scientology is. Wikipedia must be accurate and not feed into any lies that are sometimes perpetuated by problematic groups. Relegating the concern to the "Controversy" section is not enough, especially since that section is not very explicit that the movement is indeed a cult. All cult experts agree about the destructiveness of Scientology - it is not an opinion. If you define other cults as indeed cults, you must also do the same about the most destructive cult our world faces. Please note: I am not, nor have I ever been, affiliated with Scientology. I am a social worker and have followed news of world-wide cults for many years. 97.120.78.249 (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide citations from reliable sources to support your assertion? TechBear | Talk | Contributions 04:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]