User talk:IbexNu

Lethal White (novel)

Lethal White (novel) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lethal White (novel), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lethal White (novel) (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Better sources needed. No twitter. Cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lethal White (novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lethal White (novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IbexNu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 12:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EROS: But the tweet is the primary source! No other citation would be better because they all fundamentally stem from those tweets, which were made by the author (the only person privy to the relevant information) in a public setting. They constitute official statements by the author just as in a press-release, except there can be no confusion because the sourcing is direct and not subjected to processing or interpretation. It is impossible to get a more reliable source than these, and - moreover - these are as reliable as it is possible to be for anything outside of the realm of logic. Unless the account was hacked (and the tweets were left uncorrected for nearly half of a month so far) or the author was lying, this information is guaranteed to be correct and at least as correct as any other source which says or references the same thing. I know that the information in those tweets is correct with a higher certainty than I know literally anything which is reported in an adequately reliable source (such as a scientific paper or newspaper) because the announcement contained within the tweet defines itself to be true; it is like a licensed official declaring "I now pronounce you man and wife" - it is true because it says that it is true. Why not go to the direct source which literally anyone on the planet can verify for themselves and which will be the source for any other report of the same or derived information? It makes no sense to do otherwise. -- IbexNu (talk) 04:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@IbexNu: Greetings. I saw you posted a message on my talkpage and also tagged me here. Do not worry as I will correspond with you. Wikipedia users are from different countries and we may differ in our time zones. Albeit your justification, Wikipedia doesn't accept Twitter (or Facebook, Youtube,...) as a legitimate and reliable source. Moreover, primary sources are not encouraged to be used as it affiliates with the subject too closely, conflict of interest for that matter. The reason we do not accept twitter is because it is a user-generated website. If the author has press releases on the subject then it'll be good. What we want as sources are: newspaper articles, press release or articles from mainstream publication. You are advised to read the blue hyperlinks on the declination banner. If any question persist, please post a question at the Helpdesk. EROS ^message 07:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lethal White (novel) has been accepted

Lethal White (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lethal White (novel) - inline citation

H IbexNu, Greetings to you. I have reviewed your article and have reworked on the citation method on the article. Please see below on inline citation.

citing from internet source - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web and please note that Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR.

Instructions: Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the fields as per the Template: cite web and save when it is done). Examples below:

To add an in-line text citation for an internet reference, there are 3 web citing methods as below:

1.Source edit mode : fill in the source info as below {{cite web |url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= }}

2a. Visual edit mode :Please click "cite" on the menu bar and fill in the info

2b. Source edit mode or Visual edit mode: download Visual Editor and paste the URL and all fields will be filled automatically.

Examples

To add an in-line text citation for an internet reference: <ref>{{cite web|url =https://www.mmafighting.com/2018/4/5/17203890/watch-conor-mcgregor-throw-a-dolly-through-ufc-223-fighter-bus-window |title = Watch Conor McGregor throw a dolly through UFC 223 fighter bus window|accessdate = 15 April 2018|author=|last =Al-Shatti |first = Shaun |publication = mmafighting|date = 15 April 2018|archivedate =15 April 2018 }}</ref>
To add an in-line text citation for a paper reference: <ref name="Green">Green, William: ''Observers Aircraft'', page 228. Frederick Warne Publishing, 1991. ISBN 0 7232 3697 6</ref>

(note: remove nowiki tag when input the citation. Fill the info and change the date as needed. See on source edit view mode.)

I have use Visual Editor to cite the source in this article. Do note Visual Editor has a little different format as it is automated program. You would notice, the date format is different, the "publisher" becomes "work" and Visual Editor might not able to pick up the first and last name of the source's authors. Thank you and let me know if you need further assistance. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:03, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lethal White UK.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Convergence tests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmonic series. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Thanks. (Yes, I know that you are a bot). IbexNu (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]