User talk:Hk5183

May 2018

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that in this edit to Geisenhausen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwatzkofen has been accepted

Schwatzkofen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thapsic acid

Thanks for creating this article! DMacks (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles-Blanc Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jean Stern. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hk5183

Thank you for creating Prix Saintour.

User:DGG, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

very good job. Please add links to the frWP articles on the peoplewith redlinks, and then, ideally, writethe endWP article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DGG}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds Good. I still need to do more work on this page, so I'll do that. hk5183 13:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prix France Télévisions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michel Bernard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Groupe Le Monde

This article appears to be mostly a translation of the French Wikipedia article (with one totally mangled reference which I've rescued for you). Please remember to acknowledge the original work when adding a translated article to English Wikipedia. Thanks. PamD 11:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And please check your work and complete the job of translation - ref 5 is a French-language footnote, for example. Thanks. PamD 11:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Translation for guidance. PamD 11:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Project categories

Please do not add project categories, such as Category:WikiProject Guinea articles, to articles. Project categories should only appear on talkpages, by adding a project assessment banner such as {{WikiProject Africa}}. Thank you, UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Economy and Finance (Guinea), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grand prix de philosophie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Grand prix de philosophie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Grand prix de philosophie

Hello, Hk5183. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grand prix de philosophie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grand prix de philosophie has been accepted

Grand prix de philosophie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toebow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toebow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toebow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wa Kamissoko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wa Kamissoko, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks!hk5183 18:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York Cubans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Negro National League and New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindia University moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kindia University, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wa Kamissoko

Hello, Hk5183. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wa Kamissoko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wa Kamissoko

Hello, Hk5183. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wa Kamissoko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I understand. I continue to believe that this article was deemed to not meet notability requirements because it is about an African from more than 40 years ago and hence it is more difficult to find published citations. But that is basically a problem of bias inherent to the medium of Encyclopedias, which rely on "trustworthy" published material (which was often scarce in many African countries before the digital era).

Regardless, I understand that policy is policy.

thanks, hk5183 17:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC) hk5183 17:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kindia University

Hello, Hk5183. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kindia University, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kindia University

Hello, Hk5183. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kindia University".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]