Talk:Political positions of the Republican Party (United States)
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do either "limit judiciary review" or "strengthen the power of individual state's rights" present non-nuetral points of view or use normally avoided words?
The IP user 70.94.246.15 recently changed the phrasing in the section on the seperation of powers and balence of powers. I'm not personally a big fan of either phrasing, as both could be argued to support a certain perspective, but before I try to write it myself, I'm curious if anyone has any opinions on whether either phrasing is good or presents a neutral point of view, Thanks —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk•Edits) 03:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Health care topics
The health care policies are mentioned in the paragraph "economic policies". Education, on the other hand, in the paragraph "social policies". I'd reckon, health care is more social than economical. Anyway, it would deserve a separate paragraph or subparagraph instead of being part of the economic text block.Opzwartbeek (talk) 07:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@Opzwartbeek: I tried to create a health care subsection and move education to the "economic policy" section, but someone reverted my edit for no reason Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Transgender issues
All information in the LGBT issues part of the artical is about LGB issues. If it is possible, add some information about Republican positions concerning transgender people.Reprarina (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Neutrality and unreferenced claims
This article has a lot of unreferenced claims and generalizations about the Republican Party and its philosophies on liberty, so much so that it would seem to be wholly written by Democrats. As such the article has a very big problem with neutrality. In the least major claims should be referenced so it's possible to understand where the claims originate from. --2A04:981:2B00:4C00:A1AD:3698:AE1:679E (talk) 11:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I believe it was written by people who strongly hate Republicans. A version of the article viewable on google search states that the main platform of the party is White Supremacy, and "free market White supremacy". The inclusion of those statements in the google search version of the article has no basis in reality nor in facts. I am glad people on wikipedia itself are making sure these articles are view point neutral. Thank you. You are doing a great service for Americans. 2600:6C50:5C7F:CFAB:FC1A:9B0E:EDCF:26B5 (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reorganizing sections
This article is a mess. I think we should group the issues into social, economic, legal, and foreign policy sections just like on the page Political positions of the Democratic Party. On that page labor unions, environment, and trade are subsections under the "economic policy" section, immigration is under the "social policy" section, and international relations with other countries is under the "foreign policy" section. We should do likewise for this page. I tried to reorganize the sections earlier, but someone reverted my edits for no reason. Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Correct the platform for Republican party
the description of the Republican party platform is what they SAID they believed in until Trump! Since Trump, their ENTIRE platform is whatever he says it is! 73.27.142.221 (talk) 02:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Current description of Republican values is NOT correct and should be changed 2601:3C3:8300:24D0:C48F:DFF4:E9D1:2B3E (talk) 22:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Not done - see WP:NPOV. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Since Trump, their ENTIRE platform is whatever he says it is!" This party does not seem to have a platform, and it has certainly not supported the free market since at least 2016. They have proposed protectionist measures. Dimadick (talk) 03:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Political positions of the Democratic Party which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- C-Class political party articles
- Unknown-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles