Talk:Stacey Q

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by AngusWOOF, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2014-09-06.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

IMDB said she was born November 30th, 1958 (anonymous)

TV Appearances

I am 99% sure she also appeared on an episode of Full House. Since her appearances on The Facts of Life are mentioned, perhaps this should be too - unless there is some additional importance to her Facts of Life appearances. MachThree (talk) 18:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and Facts

This article needs a ton of work! I was a Stacey Q fan back in the day, and she essentially had one and a half hits on the U.S. pop chart. This article makes it sound like she was The Second Coming. Can someone with SOLID information rewrite this piece of garbage? The article is clearly filled with made-up "information". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.142.232.104 (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Her article is one of the longest I have ever seen on Wikipedia and even at the height of her fame, she was basically known for two hit singles. I will try to edit a few areas that are too wordy or irrelevant since I too consider myself to have been a Stacey Q fan. Back in the day.208.54.86.207 (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Album release dates

Im finding like two different release dates for each album, which really messes up the entire discography. Im getting one from AMG, and one from discogs.com. Can anyone set me straight on this?

Bearingbreaker92 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singles

Um, Stacey Q did not have four #1 singles on the sales chart. She had one at most! Can someone please plug in the real numbers to the Singles portion of this entry? It's ridiculous. Revisionist history stinks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.142.232.104 (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weird Al

I couldn't find anything about Weird Al and "Two Pop Tarts"?

Confused

I am getting mixed information the chart performance of stacey q's albums on the billboard hot 200. Some websites say that the "better than heaven album" hit 101,102, or 59. The same thing goes for hard machine is etheir 115, 108 or 102. And for nights like this I cannot find any idea.Angel,Isaac 10:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Staceyqboomerang.jpg

Image:Staceyqboomerang.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Staceyqheaven.jpg

Image:Staceyqheaven.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is horrible

This article is horrible and reads like a fan page and is way too long. I am removing the following that was written under her time on Facts of Life- "George Burnett and Cinnamon were never heard from again, though some fans still hope to one day find out what happened to the fictional couple.[2]" This does not sound encyclopedic. This whole article makes it sound like she was as popular as Tiffany or Debbie Gibson. She only had like 1 top 10 hit.--68.19.210.175 (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)--68.19.210.175 (talk) 02:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Stacey Q. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070125182648/http://www.stacey-q.com/somethings.htm to http://www.stacey-q.com/somethings.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070125182554/http://www.stacey-q.com/book.htm to http://www.stacey-q.com/book.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://home.pacbell.net/awiring/q%26a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]