Jump to content

Talk:Hypothalamus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 07:25, 9 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Neuroscience}}, {{WikiProject Anatomy}}, {{WikiProject Animal anatomy}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hypothalamus compared to medulla oblongata

[edit]

Are there functions that overlap between the hypothalamus and the medilla oblongata? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.99.35.174 (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Compare hypothalamus to medulla oblongata

[edit]

Are there any functions that overlap with the hypothalamus and the medulla oblongata? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helping friend of the wind (talkcontribs) 16:08, October 29, 2013‎

aging control

[edit]

Brain Region Found to Control Aging

Cai and his team have found that an immune system pathway in the hypothalamus also has a role in controlling aging. Usually, the immune system is involved in fending off infection or damage, but studies have also linked inflammatory changes with age-related conditions

http://news.yahoo.com/brain-region-found-control-aging-191717771.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

/* Nuclei */ there is a vandalism. the word "anterior" turns into "previous". i am trying to undo it.

[edit]

After three seconds, the word "anterior" on the table is being turned into previous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.247.226.195 (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Hypothalamic disease

[edit]

Not enough content to justify a split; content will largely be duplicated in the 'clinical significance' section, so I propose a merge. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, as an individual who has lived with a surgically damaged hypothalamus for 42 years, I'd prefer to keep the disease andneurological symdrome aspect seperate. When I research the hypothalamus I need to understand how the organ functions normally. I already know what happens when things DON'T work..I need a solid understanding of the hypothalamus in its normal state! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.153.138 (talk) 16:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose merge agree with previous user it deserves its own page as a disease. Also think that the hypothalamus page is long enough really. --Iztwoz (talk) 09:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. for reasons given. There's no reason that the addition in Clinical significance should detract from the rest of the page. --Iztwoz (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

psychology

[edit]

Want to be a psychologist Rabia tanvir (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nuclei

[edit]

Somatostatin is released from the periventricular nucleus not the paraventricular nucleus. The OVLT and subfornical organ are not mentioned.129.215.83.176 (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hypothalamus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hypothalamus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref misformat

[edit]

Apparently, a table is from "Guyton Twelfth Edition" but the citation does not seem to be an entire book title or a website address. It should be reformatted User:Pokeswap

Sexual orientation

[edit]

The section "Sexual orientation" previously stated: "Sex hormones that work on the developing fetal brain determine sexual orientation." With the reference: Lenz KM, McCarthy MM (December 2010). "Organized for sex - steroid hormones and the developing hypothalamus". The European Journal of Neuroscience. 32 (12): 2096–104. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07511.x. PMC 5350613. PMID 21143664.

However, that rather bold claim cannot be found in the reference, nor can anything really even close to that be found in the given reference. Also the terminology "hormones that work on" doesn't sound very scientific. I edited to change the sentence to "Sex hormones that affect the developing fetal brain may have a role in determining sexual orientation." However, that's still not really what the reference was exactly saying, but it's at least a little bit closer. For example, the terms "sexual orientation", "sexual preference", "homosexuality", "heterosexuality", and even just the word "orientation" do not appear at all in the article. There is mention of "partner preference", but it does not appear to be specifically talking about that in the context of which gender of partner is preferred.

The section "sexual orientation" in this article really needs some work. There is definitely relevant research that has been done regarding the hypothalamus and sexual orientation, but nothing so conclusive as was suggested by the sentence before I changed it. If anyone is able to willing to add to the section, and especially to add more pertinent references that can be accurately summarized without bias, that would be good.

Editing to add: Looking back at previous versions of the article, I see that the section "sexual orientation" used to be much longer and had several different references. I'm not sure why it was changed to just one sentence and just one reference. Perhaps it should be reverted back to how it was before? Vontheri (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]