Jump to content

Talk:Papeda (citrus)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:59, 11 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Food and drink}}, {{WikiProject Plants}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article should be expanded. The subdevision is according to the Swingle system.--Moshe Yakob 15:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move ?

[edit]

Given that since at least 2000, it has been recognized that Swingle's Citrus subgenus Papeda is an invalid taxonomic grouping, is there any reason to maintain this nomenclature in the page name? The term 'papeda' is still used broadly for these 'primative' unpalatable citrus even though it is now seen as another example of folk taxonomy. I would propose moving the page to Papeda (citrus) or something of the sort. Agricolae (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and do it. Agricolae (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]