Jump to content

Talk:Sustainable wildlife enterprise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 19:10, 13 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 6 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 6 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}, {{WikiProject Environment}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}, {{WikiProject Agriculture}}, {{WikiProject Biology}}, {{WikiProject Ecology}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comments

[edit]

Here's a start of what stands out to me that needs addressing:

  • Seems to be filled with WP:Peacock terms? (not sure about this one)
  • Only presents one point of view (Australia's). Mentions "experiences in countries such as South Africa and Scotland". Why not include those as well?
  • Usually, lead sections don't contain references. Lead sections summarize the entire article.
  • "Why native resources?" Section title isn't exactly encyclopedic. Perhaps "Background" or something similar?
    • "Until primary production systems can put a value on habitat and conservation areas then we will see more and more species loss." (emphasis added)
    • "Furthermore, native species are well adapted to Australia’s unique environment, allowing them to survive climatic extremes and thrive with little impact to the environment." Sounds more like an essay. Suggest this: Native species that are well adapted to Australia's unique environment allow them to survive the climatic extremes and thrive with little impact to the environment.
  • "Overseas experiences" Again, section title is not very encyclopedic. Perhaps merge into previous section? Rationale: If I lived in South Africa or Scotland, those experiences wouldn't be "oversea".

Again, this is just the beginning of the items I see needing to be addressed. Perhaps start there? – Ajltalk 01:02, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


  • Thank you for starting to look at this. I will keep working on the Peacock terms (still working out what they are) but I agree and have made changes against your suggestions. See what you think.JennyKS (talk) 03:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]