Talk:Augustinian hypothesis
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Augustinian hypothesis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Augustinian hypothesis was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Added an image
I added an image, a painting of Matthew inspired by an Angel, by Rembrandt. This painting reflects the historical tradition, so important to the Augustinian Hypothesis, at work in Renaissance art.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Augustinian hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060630080953/http://www.catholic.com:80/thisrock/1994/9403fea1.asp to http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1994/9403fea1.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 9 May 2020
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved no consensus (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Augustinian hypothesis → Augustine hypothesis – "Augustinian" refers to the religious order, and "Augustine" is the preferred Wikipedia term Elizium23 (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. "Augustinian" does indeed refer to an order, but it is also the standard adjectival form of Augustine's name, as given in Merriam–Webster, American Heritage, Oxford, and Collins. Oppose for the same reason Shakespearean tragedy is not called "Shakespeare tragedy", the Victorian era is not called the "Victoria era", and Davidic line is not called "David line". "Augustine hypothesis" sounds like a hypothesis about Augustine, or else perhaps a hypothesis proposed by Augustus. What is your basis for saying "and 'Augustine' is the preferred Wikipedia term"? — the Man in Question (in question) 03:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.