Jump to content

Talk:1968 Democratic Party presidential primaries

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 05:00, 16 January 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

I'm confused. The article states that "However, McCarthy refused to withdraw from the Presidential race and made it clear that he would contest Kennedy in the upcoming New York primary" ... and then says that only thirteen states (New York not among them) held primaries. Could someone please clarify? -- Avocado (talk) 16:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The New York primary didn't have a beauty contest until 1980, therefore delegates were on the ballot for themselves.Ericl (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Ericl. Is there a way to clarify that in the text? -- Avocado (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The one missing from the states listing was West Virginia - it is included in the chart as having "unpledged" delegates, so I corrected that particular statement so the listing is consistent with the chart. As for New York, Eric is correct, 1980 was the first year they had a primary similar to the other states in the chart. Rosalina523 (talk) 16:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely late, but New York used to have Delegate Primaries where Delegates to the National Convention were elected, as opposed to a Presidential Primary; Delegates in each Congressional District were listed with a designation indicating which candidate they supported or if they were uncommitted, and the top three vote getters would be named that District's Delegates. At-Large delegates which made up about a third of the delegation give or take would be named exclusively by the Party's State Committee. The confusing and undemocratic nature of the whole system lead to it being disbanded by 1980 in favor of a traditional Presidential Primary. --Ariostos (talk) 07:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

McCarthy

McCarthy was excluded from the title thing at the top, so I put him back.

Roger Branigin-portrait

I inserted the portrait of Roger Branigin in the candidates-gallery. I believe that fair use applies here, but I am not sure. If anyone can find out if my edit is legitimate, please do so. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 08:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Hughes Was For McCarthy

I am also confused in that the list of endorsers at the bottom lists Harold Hughes for George McGovern, yet in fact Hughes gave the nominating speech at the 1968 Democratic Convention for Eugene McCarthy. Andymickey (talk) 19:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely late, and I will have to double-check, but I vaguely remember Harold Hughes being rather... chaotic in terms of who he threw his support to. While he did ultimately support Eugene McCarthy at the Democratic Convention, I believe that at first he did support George McGovern as the successor candidate to Bobby Kennedy in lieu of Ted Kennedy having no interest himself. I think it was when he arrived at the conclusion that McCarthy was the only viable Anti-War candidate in the running that he double-backed and endorsed McCarthy, and then the McCarthy campaign asked him to make the nominating speech in the hopes of winning over delegates that had previously been in favor of Kennedy. --Ariostos (talk) 07:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New York Primary

The article mentions that McCarthy "made it clear that he would contest Kennedy in the upcoming New York primary", but New York isn't included in the subsequent list of states conducting primaries at the time or the table of primary results.--89.206.231.2 (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely late, but New York used to have Delegate Primaries where Delegates to the National Convention were elected, as opposed to a Presidential Primary; Delegates in each Congressional District were listed with a designation indicating which candidate they supported or if they were uncommitted, and the top three vote getters would be named that District's Delegates. At-Large delegates which made up about a third of the delegation give or take would be named exclusively by the Party's State Committee. The confusing and undemocratic nature of the whole system lead to it being disbanded by 1980 in favor of a traditional Presidential Primary. --Ariostos (talk) 07:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In-Progress New Primaries and Caucuses Results List

Something I have been working on for a couple of days now, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the sources I have on hand, primarily the archives of the New York Times, are not going to be enough to finish this. I'll admit that I have always wanted to fill out the entirety of the map for each of the Presidential nomination contests as, realistically, the primaries were always at most something of a sideshow until '72 or '76, and it is important to note how the cards came down in the other States to better explain the situation on the Convention floor. Of course the '68 Democratic Primaries are complicated by Kennedy's assassination... which complicates how best to display the results. As an example, Indiana was won by Kennedy and he took at least sixty votes, potentially sixty three depending on how the State Convention felt when they certified Kennedy's victory; unfortunately the Convention was to be held some time after the California primary, and with Kennedy's death the Indiana delegates were legally uncommitted. Fast-forward to the the Convention, the State Democratic Party stacks the delegation with "uncommitted" Humphrey supporters, with four or five delegates awarded to McCarthy.
Therefore, it seems important to display the situation of the Primaries as it existed on June 4th with those final primaries, but that it seems just as important to display the State of the Race as of August 26th when all of the contests have concluded and the Kennedy-favoring delegations have moved elsewhere. I also feel it is important to push back the Presidential Primaries that don't award any delegates in favor of the Delegate Primaries that do, as those would be far more representative; Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire are the ones that come to mind.
Any help or input that could be provided by other users would be immensely helpful, as I'm loathe to put the table in in its current state. I'll continue tinkering away here and there, I know that there are quite a number of States still missing especially in the South and West (i.e. Texas), but there may not be much more I myself can add. --Ariostos (talk) 07:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Date Total pledged

delegates

Contest Delegates won and popular vote
McCarthy Kennedy Johnson Humphrey Favorite Son(s) Wallace Uncommitted Others
March 12 24 New Hampshire[1] 20
23,263 (41.94%)
606 (1.09%)[a] 		4
27,520 (49.62%)[a] 		– –
3,874 (0.36%)[a] 		–
201 (6.98%)[b]
March 24 6 (38) Kansas - 1st CD[2] – – – – – – 6 –
March 28 28 South Carolina[3][4] – – – – 28[c] – – –
March 30 32 (38) Kansas[5] – – – – – – 32 –
April 2 60 Wisconsin[6] 52
412,160 (56.23%)
46,507 (6.35%)[a] 		8
253,696 (34.61%)
3,605 (0.49%)[a] 		–
4,031 (0.55%)[a] 		–
13,003 (1.77%)[d]
April 8 22 Alaska[7] – – – – – – 22 –
April 10 3 New York - 28th CD[8]
19 (7.85%)
101 (41.74%) 		– – 3
122 (50.41%)[e] 		– – –
0 Connecticut[9] 30,077 (44.31%) – – – – – 37,794 (55.69%) –
April 20 19 Arizona[10] – – – – – – 19 –
April 24 0 (130) Pennsylvania[11] 428,891 (71.49%) 65,430 (10.91%)[a] 21,265 (3.54%)[a] 51,998 (8.67%)[a] – 24,147 (4.03%)[a] – 8,235 (1.37%)[a][f]
April 29 49 Maryland[12][13] – – – 49 – – – –
April 30 72 Massachusetts[14] 72
122,697 (49.30%) 		68,604 (27.56%)[a] 6,890 (2.77%)[a] 44,156 (17.74%)[a] – 1,688 (0.68%)[a] – 4,868 (1.96%)[a][g]
May 7 63 Indiana[15]
209,695 (27.01%) 		60
328,118 (42.26%) 		– – 3
238,700 (30.74%) 		– – –
115 Ohio[16] 3
 – – – 112
549,140 (100.00%) 		– – –
23 Washington, D.C.[17] – 23
57,555 (62.48%) 		–
34,559 (37.52%) 		– – – –
May 11 22 Delaware[18] – 6 – 16 – – – –
May 12 26 Hawaii[19] – – – – – – 26 –
28 Wyoming[20] – – – – – – 28 –
May 14 30 Nebraska[21] 2[h]
50,655 (31.15%) 		20[h]
84,102 (51.72%)
9,187 (5.65%)
12,087 (7.43%)[a] 		–
1,298 (0.80%)[a] 		8[h]
5,282 (3.25%)[a][i]
36 West Virginia[22][23] – – – – – – 36
149,282 (100.00%)[j]
 –
May 16 43 Georgia[24] – – – – – – 43 –
May 18 27 Maine[25] – – – – 27 – – –
May 25 6 Colorado 1st CD[26] ?[k] ?[k] – – – – – –
46 Iowa[27] 5 25[l] – 9.5 – – 6.5 –
19 Vermont[28] 5
270 (27.08%) 		7
327 (32.80%) 		– 10
400 (40.12%)[m] 		– – – –
May 28 63 Florida[29] 4
147,216 (28.73%) 		– – – 59
236,242 (46.11%) 		–
128,899 (25.16%)[n] 		–
35 Oregon[30] 35
163,990 (43.96%)
141,631 (37.96%)
45,174 (12.11%)
12,421 (0.80%)[a] 		–
957 (0.26%)[a] 		–
8,897 (2.34%)[a][o]
June 1 60 Missouri[31] – – – – – – 60[p] –
June 2 96 Michigan[32] – – – – – – 96[q] –
June 4 172 California[33]
1,329,301 (41.78%) 		172
1,472,166 (46.27%) 		– –
380,206 (11.95%)[r] 		– – –
80 New Jersey[34][35] 20
9,906 (36.09%)[a][s]
8,603 (31.35%)[a]
380 (1.39%)[a]
5,578 (20.32%)[a] 		60
[s]
1,399 (5.10%)[a] 		– –
24 South Dakota[36]
13,145 (20.45%) 		24
31,826 (49.51%) 		–
19,316 (30.05%)[t] 		– – – –
June 6 59 North Carolina[37] – – – – 59[u] – – –
June 11 48 (118) Illinois[38][39] 2
4,646 (38.59%)[a][v] 		–
162 (1.35%)[a]
2,059 (17.10%)[a] 		–
768 (6.38%)[a] 		46
[a][v]
4,403 (36.58%)[a][w]
June 13 5 Panama Canal Zone[40] – – – – – – 5[x] –
June 15 26 Montana[41] 2 – – 24 – – – –
June 18 123 (190) New York[42][43] 62
181,947 (0.00%)[y] 		30
73,415 (0.00%)[z] 		– 19
22,311 (0.00%) 		– – 12
62,568 (0.00%) 		–
June 22 44 Connecticut[44][45] – – – – – – 44[aa] –
14 (52) Minnesota[46]
484 (43.25%)[ab] 		– – 14
635 (56.75%)[ab] 		– – – –
June 28 65 (190) New York[47] 15.5 – – – – – 49.5[ac] –
July 6 6 Colorado 3rd CD[48] 2 – – 3 – – 1[ad] –
Estimated pledged delegates 298 367 12 127.5 352.5 0 463 0
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag Write-In; Candidate was not formally on the ballot.
  2. ^ Includes 186 votes for John Crommelin, 2,532 write-in votes for Richard Nixon, 506 write-in votes for Paul Fisher, and 249 write-in votes for Nelson Rockefeller
  3. ^ While originally uncommitted, the delegates on April 10th named the Governor of South Carolina, Robert McNair, as their Favorite Son candidate to the National Convention. Some thought was given to him being a regional candidate for the South or potentially as a candidate for the Vice Presidency.
  4. ^ Includes 11,861 votes for 'None of the Above'.
  5. ^ Congressmen Joseph Resnick of the 28th District sought to become the Favorite-Son of New York at the National Convention.
  6. ^ Includes 3,434 write-in votes for Richard Nixon, 1,849 write-in votes for Nelson Rockefeller, 327 write-in votes for Ronald Reagan, and 21 write-in votes for Raymond Shafer.
  7. ^ Includes 2,275 write-in votes for Nelson Rockefeller and 575 write-in votes for Richard Nixon.
  8. ^ a b c Because of filing deadline problems, only one delegate was listed on the ballot as actually pledged to Kennedy; thirteen others on the official Kennedy slate were uncommitted, with another nine being listed as pledged to Johnson. The thirteen uncommitted delegates that favored Kennedy were elected and are counted as his despite not being formally pledged. Eight other uncommitted delegates not part of the Kennedy slate where elected. Kennedy also won two Congressional Districts with two delegates apiece, McCarthy carrying one.
  9. ^ Includes 2,731 write-in votes for Richard Nixon, 1,905 write-in votes for Ronald Reagan, 509 write-in votes for Nelson Rockefeller, and 12 write-in votes for Americus Liberator.
  10. ^ While many of the delegates had clear listed preferences, the delegates were not bound to these pledges. A detailed count of the results by Congressional District could not be found either; of those delegates elected At-Large as last reported, nine favored Humphrey, five were uncommitted, two favored Kennedy, one favored Johnson.
  11. ^ a b It is mentioned that a coalition of Kennedy and McCarthy Delegates won, but their apportionment is not mentioned.
  12. ^ Unfortunately the Caucus vote hasn't been found.
  13. ^ The source listed it as three hundred, possibly a typo. Four hundred seem to match up with the percentages.
  14. ^ Headed by former State Senator Scott Kelly of Lakeland, the Slate was considered favorable to supporting either Kennedy's or Wallace's nomination.
  15. ^ Includes 3,082 write-in votes for Ronald Reagan, 2,974 write-in votes for Richard Nixon, and 2,841 write-in votes for Nelson Rockefeller.
  16. ^ Originally the delegation was to be pledged to Governor Warren Hearnes as a Favorite-Son, but he withdrew his name from consideration. Though uncommitted, a poll made of the delegation indicated that fifty-seven were in favor Humphrey's nomination, three in favor of McCarthy's.
  17. ^ The delegation as a whole was uncommitted, and the claims as to which delegates favored which candidates varied wildly; it is generally held that Humphrey held was favored by most, but Kennedy had a decent shot at winning the favor of the majority as well, depending on the outcome of the California primary.
  18. ^ An uncommitted slate headed by California Attorney General Thomas Lynch was also on the ballot; originally a stalking horse for President Johnson, it was generally understood after Johnson had dropped out that the slate was in favor of Vice President Humphrey.
  19. ^ a b The Presidential Primary in New Jersey had no influence over the delegates being selected; a separate primary was being held for thirty of the delegates to the National Convention, with McCarthy supporters winning twenty spots. The other ten, as well as fifty others on which basis their election is not immediately clear, were lead by Governor Richard Hughes.
  20. ^ While the former Johnson Slate made every effort they could to make it clear that they intended to support Hubert Humphrey for the nomination, there remained a considerable amount of confusion among South Dakota voters over whether they were voting for President Johnson or Vice President Humphrey; the contest was expected to be close as compared to the twenty point margin of victory Kennedy experienced.
  21. ^ The North Carolina delegation was pledged to back Governor Dan Moore as their Favorite-Son, but upon being freed of their pledge by Moore the overwhelming majority were expected to back Hubert Humphrey for the nomination.
  22. ^ a b The Presidential Primary in Illinois had no influence over the delegates being selected; a separate primary was being held for forty-eight of the delegates to the National Convention. McCarthy struggled to establish an effective campaign here, and only managed to name twenty-three candidates out of forty-eight, in fourteen out of the twenty-four Congressional Districts being competed in. Competing against the political machine lead by Chicago Mayor Richard Daley with its superior organization, few if any of the McCarthy delegates were expected to win. Daley himself headed what was to be an uncommitted delegation to the Convention, but it was presumed that he favored Humphrey's nomination.
  23. ^ Includes 4,052 write-in votes for Ted Kennedy.
  24. ^ While technically uncommitted, all the delegates selected supported Humphrey for the nomination; the argument made against a direct pledge to Humphrey was that it would enable to delegation to have more bargaining power at the Convention.
  25. ^ There was no Presidential Primary in New York, only one for delegates to the National Convention, with three elected to represent each of the forty-one Congressional Districts. The tabulation of the vote is incomplete, uncontested districts not being mentioned by the source.
  26. ^ The thirty delegates elected were candidates who had filed before Kennedy's assassination, and were now running on the themes and principles of the late Kennedy's Campaign; technically they should be considered uncommitted, but they were competing against officially uncommitted candidates as well.
  27. ^ There had been an expectation that McCarthy would be awarded some delegates, but the McCarthyite delegates to the State Convention bolted when the Regulars lead by John Moran Bailey refused to allot the delegates based on the ratio of Convention delegates elected; Bailey offered to award McCarthy five to nine delegates, whereas the McCarthyites demanded a minimum of ten. Following the walkout all forty-four delegates were elected as uncommitted under Bailey's direction, generally seen as a result that strongly benefited Humphrey's campaign.
  28. ^ a b Most of Minnesota's delegates had already been awarded through District Conventions that had been held earlier in the year, with Humphrey carrying three Districts and McCarthy carrying two. The McCarthyites had expected that the At-Large delegates would be apportioned three to two in the same manner, but those in favor of Humphrey considered it a necessity that the State delegation be as solidly behind the Vice President as possible so as to not prove an embarassment at the National Convention.
  29. ^ The At-Large delegates were allotted by the State Democratic Committee, and besides those considered McCarthy delegates by the Committee itself it is unknown how many are uncommitted against how many are formally in favor of Humphrey. It must be stated as well that some of the McCarthy delegates themselves were considered suspect, many having little to no connection with the McCarthy campaign.
  30. ^ Originally a delegated filed to support Kennedy's campaign, they are formally uncommitted.
  1. ^ "Johnson Margin Cut to 230 Votes". The New York Times. 16 March 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  2. ^ "Kansas Delegates Named". The New York Times. 24 March 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  3. ^ "South Carolina Democrats Pick Negro Delegates". The New York Times. 28 March 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  4. ^ "Carolina Delegates Given To Gov. M'Nair". The New York Times. 10 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  5. ^ "Kansas Skirmish Won By Kennedy". The New York Times. 30 March 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  6. ^ "M'Carthy Wins Wisconsin". The New York Times. 3 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  7. ^ "Meeting in Alaska". The New York Times. 8 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  8. ^ "Favorite Son Bid Is Won By Resnick". The New York Times. 10 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  9. ^ "Connecticut Vote Buoys McCarthy". The New York Times. 10 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  10. ^ "Democrats in Arizona Vote Slate Supporting Humphrey". The New York Times. 20 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  11. ^ "M'Carthy Lead 9-1 In Pennsylvania". The New York Times. 24 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  12. ^ "Humphrey Gains in Maryland". The New York Times. 29 April 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  13. ^ "Maryland Backs Vice President". The New York Times. 10 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  14. ^ "Rockefeller Victory in Massachusetts Cost $1,500". The New York Times. 1 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  15. ^ "Kennedy Wins In Indiana". The New York Times. 7 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  16. ^ "McCarthy Delegates". The New York Times. 8 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  17. ^ "Kennedy Captures Capital's Delegates". The New York Times. 7 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  18. ^ "16 Delaware Votes Pledged to Humphrey". The New York Times. 11 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  19. ^ "Humphrey Defeats Rivals' Bloc To Win Most Hawaii Delegates". The New York Times. 12 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  20. ^ "25-28 Wyoming Delegates Viewed as Pro-Humphrey". The New York Times. 12 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  21. ^ "Nebraska Gives 53% To Kennedy". The New York Times. 14 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  22. ^ "West Virginia Voting Is Close". The New York Times. 15 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  23. ^ "Humphrey Gets Delegates". The New York Times. 18 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  24. ^ "Unpledged Slate Voted In Georgia". The New York Times. 16 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  25. ^ "Humphrey Gains Victory In Maine". The New York Times. 18 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  26. ^ "Humphrey Loses In Denver". The New York Times. 25 May 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  27. ^ "Kennedy Is Victor In Iowa Contest". The New York Times. 25 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  28. ^ "Humphrey Wins In Vermont". The New York Times. 25 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  29. ^ "Collins Takes Lead In Florida Senatorial Contest". The New York Times. 30 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  30. ^ "M'Carthy Beats Kennedy In Oregon Primary Upset". The New York Times. 28 May 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  31. ^ "Humphrey Wins Missouri Votes". The New York Times. 1 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  32. ^ "Democrats Pick Michigan Slate". The New York Times. 2 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  33. ^ "Coast Tally Slow". The New York Times. 4 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  34. ^ "Hughes Forces Victors In Jersey". The New York Times. 4 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  35. ^ "Jubilation of McCarthy Backers in Jersey Is Stilled". The New York Times. 5 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  36. ^ "South Dakota Ballot a Triumph For Kennedy Over Both Rivals". The New York Times. 4 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  37. ^ "Humphrey Gains Carolina Backing". The New York Times. 6 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  38. ^ "Illinois Favoring Humphrey, Nixon". The New York Times. 11 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  39. ^ "Nixon Supporters Elected In Illinois". The New York Times. 13 June 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  40. ^ "Pro-Humphrey Delegation Is Selected By Canal Zone". The New York Times. 13 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  41. ^ "Humphrey Gains In Montana". The New York Times. June 15 1968. Retrieved 11 January 2021. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  42. ^ "McCarthy Wins Majority of Races Here". The New York Times. 19 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  43. ^ "300 McCarthyites Stage A Walkout At State Meeting". The New York Times. 29 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  44. ^ "Democrats Begin Hartford Battle". The New York Times. 22 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  45. ^ "200 McCarthy Men Bolt In Hartford". The New York Times. 23 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  46. ^ "Humphrey Gains 14 In Minnesota In Delegate Test". The New York Times. 22 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  47. ^ "300 McCarthyites Stage A Walkout At State Meeting". The New York Times. 29 June 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  48. ^ "Colorado Compromise Adds Three Humphrey Delegates". The New York Times. 6 July 1968. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
@Ariostos: Very excellent work here; I have begun doing the same separately to help complete this article and bring it up to standards. I will begin integrating this work into the article; unfortunate that nobody has built on it in the prior two years. Would be happy to work with you on this if you are still actively interested. I'm pleased to say I have a Newspapers.com subscription which would allow us to move past the NY Times, but it doesn't resolve the main problem which prevents me from just copy-pasting your sources in (besides the confusion you noted in how to deal with delegate projections versus final vote, which is universal to these articles): in many cases, the newspapers report partial or inaccurate totals which are later clarified. So, while newspapers are a great resource for us, official certified results are preferable where possible. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

@-A-M-B-1996- Your restoration is nonsensical ("favorite sons" who received votes and delegates and appeared on ballots are not included, but Humphrey, who FAMOUSLY sat-out the primary is represented in the infobox for the results of the primary?)

It also misrepresents history. If someone went off of your representation, they'd be bewildered as to why it was seen as undemocratic that Humphrey was selected as the nominee at the convention. After all, you are misrepresenting him as having won his delegates through the primaries rather than being voted for by the delegates that were not awarded through primary process (which is actually what happened). Please revert and discuss further here. SecretName101 (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@-A-M-B-1996- are you unwilling to discuss these points? SecretName101 (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@-A-M-B-1996- If you are unwilling to discuss changes, you cannot expect them to remain against argued objections, now can you? It's been more than two weeks, and you have been active on this article, yet failed to defend your infobox preference. SecretName101 (talk) 02:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1968_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries&oldid=1196054685"