User talk:Sandstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.117.93.145 (talk) at 12:27, 18 January 2024 (→‎Michele Evans: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page!

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

  • Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
  • If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].
  • If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.


Start a new talk topic


Happy New Year, Sandstein

Good article reassessment for History of the Swiss Air Force

History of the Swiss Air Force has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering about closing decision on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vittorino Milanesio

Hello, thank you for closing the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vittorino Milanesio as no consensus. I appreciate the work of admins as it can be a thankless job. I was also wondering why it was not closed as keep instead? Understanding WP:NOTAVOTE, there were four votes to keep and only one vote to delete (two including the nominator). The keep votes were in my opinion substantive, providing specific sources to support notability, while the lone delete vote only questioned the validity of one source, and did not respond to followup. So I am wondering why it was closed as no consensus, and if it would be possible to change the vote to keep so as to more accurately inform future deletion nominators about its status. --Habst (talk) 16:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Habst, I've reexamined the AfD and re-closed it. Thanks for the query. Sandstein 17:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One World (TV series)

Good day. If you are willing, can you please let me know specifically what you would like to see happen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One World (TV series)? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in particular. Sandstein 13:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Gabriel Attal

On 10 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gabriel Attal, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed [talk] [OMT] 00:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WHY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.234.124.203 (talk) 03:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michele Evans

So you chose to completely ignore my valid points and deleted the page. What was your reasoning? 69.117.93.145 (talk) 09:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of Evans' book Rikers Island from Rikers Island demonstrates your bias as the book is available at Barnes & Nobel, Walmart, Harvard Book Store etc. 69.117.93.145 (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]