Talk:ABBYY

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ABBYY article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 April 2020. The result of the discussion was delete.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The straightforward ABBYY title has also been protected since June 2022 [1]. AllyD (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AllyD and Bbb23: The article was rewritten from scratch by translation from https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Redirect/revision/39216011 Then the article was significantly revised to strengthen the demonstration of the notability of the article's subject. It is really notable company:

It has a long, more than 30-year history
It has developers offices in the USA and several European countries, including Ukraine, Germany, Serbia
It has representative offices in 15 countries
It has 1000+ employees
It sells its products to almost 200 countries worldwide
It has partnership agreements with PwC and many others huge companies
The article about the company exists in 19 Wikipedias, including German, French, Spanish, Polish and others
The importance and notability of the company in its global market segments (IDP, Process Intelligence, OCR) is recognized by leading analytical companies
Its notability has been demonstrated in the article by citing substantial coverage in many secondary independent sources like Bloomberg, Authority Magazine, Knowledge Management World, Robotic Process Automation Master, VentureBeat, Information & Data Manager magazine and many others
Most of the citations in the article are from publications that appeared after April 2020

P.S. Google Search for ABBYY demonstrates 7 500 000 + results --Perohanych (talk) 21:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Er... putting a promotional link in your contribution to the Talk page does suggest you're not entirely unbiased. Deb (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"to let Wikipedians know about a really powerful tool to share free knowledge" That's a textbook definition of promotion. Deb (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: Well, it was my sincere wish to share my experience and my knowledge with the aim to empower Wikipedians. People write articles about notable actors, they love, I wrote an article about a notable company, I love. Where is a bias? From now on, I will never express my attitude to the subject of articles on their talk pages. I did not know that it was forbidden. I have hided the paragraphs, you may delete them.

Is there any policy explaining how to remove protection from an article so that the {{Db-move}} template can be placed? --Perohanych (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You won't be able to do it yourself but I am willing to do it as long as you understand the guidelines. I will be watching it to make sure it remains neutral. Deb (talk) 09:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what should I do? --Perohanych (talk) 07:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just follow the guidelines, on everything. There are no exceptions. Deb (talk) 07:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any specific comments? I just want to understand what exactly I should do next. --Perohanych (talk) 13:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to delete a {{notability}} template from the article and move the article to "ABBYY" --Perohanych (talk) 21:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]