Talk:Cock Tavern Theatre

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Great Work

I can see you're working on a project here. Wanted to drop you a note that you're doing a great job, and this article is coming along well. -- Matthew Glennon (^T/_C\^D) 14:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Press quotes

These are entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia article and are basically functioning as advertising. The review excerpts are all positive, are quite obviously "cherry-picked", do not include any criticism present in the review and are very misleading. Many of them are also from self-published or reader-generated websites and are therefore not reliable sources. Here are just 4 examples:

The Tempest - "Shakespeare himself would be at home in this production" referenced to Mylondon which also says:
"It also never really comes to terms with the problem of Caliban – not that now, with our modern-day attitudes towards disability and disadvantage, that there is, perhaps, a solution to Caliban. She’s played here by Clare Cameron with energy and presence, but lacking in either malevolence or a real ability to evoke pity."

A Model For Mankind - "outstandingly good". This quote refers to the actors' performances, not the play and is referenced to BBNews which also says:
"But, while it is salutary to be reminded of the Soviet past, Sheldon gets bogged down in the did-he-or-didn’t-he issue of whether Shostakovich betrayed Isaak. Unlike the question of whether Shaffer’s Salieri killed Mozart, it is not strong enough to sustain the play."

Secrets - "Secrets comes across as an entertaining and thoughtful production" is referenced to Extra Extra which also says:
"the unimaginativeness of the entrances and exits makes the experience of visually watching the play as one similar to sitting in front of a strobe light; as there are moments of brilliance followed by confusing darkness. Perhaps these moments could have been made a bit less conspicuous by more thoughtful light design, but Claire Childs sticks to tried and tested formulas rather than experiment with something new. The same could be said about the production's set/costume design by Phoebe Cole and sound design by Robert Lewis. Though the designs may be appropriate to the production, they fail to offer any sort of a visual or aural novelty."

Nightsongs - "beautiful and detailed...piercing emotional integrity" - again refers to two of the actors' performances not the play and is referenced to The Public Reviews which pretty much pans it:
"director Hamish MacDougall lacks enough of a holistic vision to tie this strange piece together and it sometimes feels patchy. Individual items which bizarrely work (the Lucian Freud-esque baby painting hanging above our sad couple’s heads like a noose or the selfishly ‘cool’ jazz music) are confusing when put together. [...] A harrowing but possibly unnecessary night of theatre."

To conform with Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view, I am removing the quotes and leaving the references to the reviews for the reader to decide for themselves. Voceditenore (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC) updated by Voceditenore (talk) 05:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I have removed "Upcoming productions". This is not the place to advertise your future productions, and "upcoming" is meaningless in an encyclopedia article. If the production is notable and already has press coverage include it in the main body of the text. Otherwise leave it out until such coverage is available. Wikipedia is not a free web space provider for the theatre and must not be used as one. Secondly, the biographies of the latest two staff added, are completely without references to verify the contents. Unless references are provided, they will be removed. Note also that this is an encyclopedia article. Per the Wikipedia Manual of Style, please do not refer to people by their first names. Finally, any editor who has any affiiliation whatsoever with this theatre and/or its personnel, should not edit this article again until they have read very carefully Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Voceditenore (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cock Tavern Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003150756/http://www.blanchemarvin.com/pba.aspx to http://www.blanchemarvin.com/pba.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cock Tavern Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]